Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Created workflow to run tests at simulated dates #2185

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

maxirmx
Copy link
Member

@maxirmx maxirmx commented Jan 24, 2024

No description provided.

@maxirmx maxirmx linked an issue Jan 24, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3220018) 75.87% compared to head (f3c6b97) 77.24%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2185      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.87%   77.24%   +1.36%     
==========================================
  Files         194      194              
  Lines       39060    37724    -1336     
==========================================
- Hits        29638    29140     -498     
+ Misses       9422     8584     -838     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@maxirmx maxirmx requested a review from ni4 January 24, 2024 16:58
@maxirmx
Copy link
Member Author

maxirmx commented Jan 24, 2024

@ni4, I have created a workflow to run at simulated dates
It is unstable at '+1 year' and always fails at '+5 years'
What would we like to do with it ?
I can look at the issues but not right now.

@ni4
Copy link
Contributor

ni4 commented Jan 24, 2024

@maxirmx Thanks for this! I'll take care of issues, most likely those are related to exped keys, used in tests or something like that.

Copy link
Contributor

@ni4 ni4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@maxirmx maxirmx marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2024 16:33
@maxirmx maxirmx merged commit 9491474 into main Feb 1, 2024
123 checks passed
@maxirmx maxirmx deleted the maxirmx-timemachine-2183 branch February 1, 2024 18:57
ni4 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
* Created base workflow to run tests in simulated dates
* Opmtimized workflow to run tests in future dates
* Fix timemachine workflow.
* Remove redundant if.

---------

Co-authored-by: Nickolay Olshevsky <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI: add runner with timestamp from the future.
2 participants