Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

srdfdom_advr dependecy #8

Open
liesrock opened this issue Mar 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

srdfdom_advr dependecy #8

liesrock opened this issue Mar 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@arocchi @EnricoMingo

Comments

@liesrock
Copy link
Member

liesrock commented Mar 6, 2017

Hi @arocchi , @EnricoMingo : we are currently using a fork of srdfdom library (https://github.com/liesrock/srdfdom) for our new software architecture: is it possible to change the idynutils dependency from srdfdom to srdfdom_advr? Do you see any problems?
@duncanjovial would need it to have @krprzemo walking module in the new XBotInterface library.
@liesrock liesrock changed the title srdfdom_dependecy srdfdom_advr dependecy Mar 6, 2017
@liesrock
Copy link
Member Author

liesrock commented Mar 6, 2017 •
edited
Loading

If I am not wrong we noticed with @EnricoMingo and @alaurenzi that having both srdfdom and srfdom_advr can create problems in the system.

@arocchi
Copy link

arocchi commented Mar 8, 2017

The best way I see it could be done, is use one or the other, whichever is present on the system, with priority on the _advr version (for the unfortunate cases where both are present). Still, I would prefer the two libraries being compatible so that one can have both installed in the system. Is that feasible?

@liesrock liesrock removed their assignment Oct 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@arocchi arocchi

@EnricoMingo EnricoMingo

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@liesrock @arocchi @EnricoMingo