You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The LICENSE file just mention LGPL3. I think it is ok to just mention a single license in the license file, but somewhere else (such as headers file or documentation) we should mention that the code is licensed actually under LGPL2 or any later version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
traversaro
changed the title
Update licensing to mention that the code is dual licensed under LGPL2 or any later version
Update licensing info to mention that the code islicensed under LGPL2 or any later version
Apr 8, 2019
traversaro
changed the title
Update licensing info to mention that the code islicensed under LGPL2 or any later version
Update licensing info to mention that the code is licensed under LGPL2 or any later version
Apr 8, 2019
The LICENSE file just mention LGPL3. I think it is ok to just mention a single license in the license file, but somewhere else (such as headers file or documentation) we should mention that the code is licensed actually under LGPL2 or any later version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: