Fix the okhttp CVE issues #1
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
roczei
force-pushed
the
okhttp-cve-fix
branch
5 times, most recently
from
a354589
to
d1404e1
Compare
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade `okhttp` to 4.12.0 and `okio` to 3.9.0 ### Why are the changes needed? okhttp depends on okio which has to be upgraded as well. The new okhttp version fixes the following vulnerabilities: 1) CVE-2023-0833 - A flaw was found in Red Hat's AMQ-Streams, which ships a version of the OKHttp component with an information disclosure flaw via an exception triggered by a header containing an illegal value. This issue could allow an authenticated attacker to access information outside of their regular permissions. CVSSv3 Score:- 5.5(Medium) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0833 2) CVE-2021-0341 - In verifyHostName of OkHostnameVerifier.java, there is a possible way to accept a certificate for the wrong domain due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. CVSSv3 Score:- 7.5(High) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-0341 square/okhttp#6724 There are two places in the Spark repository where the okhttp dependency comes in as transitive dependency: 1) [INFO] +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-cloud-storage:jar:3.4.0:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-annotations:jar:3.4.0:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-aliyun:jar:3.4.0:compile [INFO] | | +- com.aliyun.oss:aliyun-sdk-oss:jar:3.13.2:compile [INFO] | | | +- org.jdom:jdom2:jar:2.0.6:compile [INFO] | | | +- com.aliyun:aliyun-java-sdk-core:jar:4.5.10:compile [INFO] | | | | +- org.ini4j:ini4j:jar:0.5.4:compile [INFO] | | | | +- io.opentracing:opentracing-api:jar:0.33.0:compile [INFO] | | | | \- io.opentracing:opentracing-util:jar:0.33.0:compile [INFO] | | | | \- io.opentracing:opentracing-noop:jar:0.33.0:compile [INFO] | | | +- com.aliyun:aliyun-java-sdk-ram:jar:3.1.0:compile [INFO] | | | \- com.aliyun:aliyun-java-sdk-kms:jar:2.11.0:compile [INFO] | | \- org.codehaus.jettison:jettison:jar:1.5.4:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-azure-datalake:jar:3.4.0:compile [INFO] | | \- com.microsoft.azure:azure-data-lake-store-sdk:jar:2.3.9:compile [INFO] | \- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-huaweicloud:jar:3.4.0:compile [INFO] | \- com.huaweicloud:esdk-obs-java:jar:3.20.4.2:compile [INFO] | +- com.jamesmurty.utils:java-xmlbuilder:jar:1.2:compile [INFO] | +- com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp:jar:3.14.2:compile [INFO] | \- com.squareup.okio:okio:jar:1.17.6:compile The Hadoop team has attempted to remove okhttp from their codebase: remove okhttp usage: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18890 Unfortunately the hadoop-huaweicloud dependency is still there which pulls in the vulnerable okhttp 3.x version. https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-cloud-storage-project/hadoop-cloud-storage/pom.xml#L137C19-L137C37 3.4.0 is the only available version here: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.hadoop/hadoop-huaweicloud 2) [INFO] +- org.apache.spark:spark-kubernetes_2.13:jar:4.0.0-SNAPSHOT:compile [INFO] | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-httpclient-okhttp:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-client-api:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-core:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | | \- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-common:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-gatewayapi:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-resource:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-rbac:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-admissionregistration:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-apps:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-autoscaling:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-apiextensions:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-batch:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-certificates:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-coordination:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-discovery:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-events:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-extensions:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-flowcontrol:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-networking:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-metrics:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-policy:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-scheduling:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-storageclass:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | +- io.fabric8:kubernetes-model-node:jar:6.13.3:compile [INFO] | | | \- org.snakeyaml:snakeyaml-engine:jar:2.7:compile [INFO] | | +- com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp:jar:3.12.12:compile [INFO] | | | \- com.squareup.okio:okio:jar:1.17.6:compile [INFO] | | \- com.squareup.okhttp3:logging-interceptor:jar:3.12.12:compile The kubernetes-client's maintainers do not want upgrade to okhttp 4.x because it's based on Kotlin, they recommend to exclude 3.x. Related documentation: https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/blob/main/doc/KubernetesClientWithIPv6Clusters.md My proposed solution based on the above finding: I think we should exclude the 3.x version and switch to use okhttp 4.x. It is binary backwards compatible with okhttp 3.x. More details are here: https://square.github.io/okhttp/upgrading_to_okhttp_4/ ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?