-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code action callfunc operator refactor #385
Open
TwitchBronBron
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
codeAction-callfuncOperator-refactor
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a06532f
Fix `replace` code action, add delete support.
TwitchBronBron dcbc3a8
Add callfunc refactor code action
TwitchBronBron 5584b22
refactor invalid as first callfunc argument.
TwitchBronBron 8853af8
Merge branch 'master' into codeAction-callfuncOperator-refactor
TwitchBronBron e60ca4a
Merge branch 'master' into codeAction-callfuncOperator-refactor
TwitchBronBron 64e23b2
Merge branch 'master' into codeAction-callfuncOperator-refactor
TwitchBronBron File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nobody would actually have this code, coz it would not work (it woudl do nothing at run time).
It would have to be
someComponent.callfunc("doThing", invalid)
, which (imho) should become[email protected]()
(which is semantically equivalent).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I understand the "standard", I've seen callfunc in the wild with no second parameter. I believe @elsassph also had mentioned they use it like that in their code successfully.
However, I agree, we should refactor
someComponent.callfunc("doThing", invalid)
to[email protected]()
as well since I think that's what we do behind the scenes in the transpiled BrightScript, so I'll update this PR to support that as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
callfunc
without argument should be a warning, but I have seen it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, guess you guys are right, if there's a default param on the function, then in that case callfunc without
invalid
will work (I wasn't aware of this or it changed since I got this notion > 2 years ago). Clearly, we can never know if this is the case, so 🤷 I'm not sure if even have a warning here..