Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

299-fix: focus on course card differs #341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

Wystov
Copy link
Collaborator

@Wystov Wystov commented Jun 25, 2024

What type of PR is this? (select all that apply)

  • 🐛 Bug Fix

Description

on some resolutions and some cards with lower content height there was a second chin on hover effect cuz of height: min-content. changed it to 100% to be consistent

Related Tickets & Documents

Screenshots, Recordings

image

Added/updated tests?

  • 🙅‍♂️ No, because they aren't needed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Updated the course card layout to use a fixed height for more consistent appearance across different devices.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The primary change involves updating the layout of a course card UI component by adjusting its height property in the CSS file. The height is changed from min-content to 100%, which may impact the card's appearance and behavior. This change aims to ensure consistency across the focus states of different course cards.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/entities/courses/ui/course-card/course-card.scss Updated the height property of the course card from min-content to 100%.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
The focus state is consistent across course cards (#299)

Poem

In the garden of learning, courses do grow,
Cards now stand tall, in an orderly row.
Consistent in focus, each one does shine,
A smoother experience, by clever design.
Hats off to the coders, in the Rabbit's land,
For making our courses look so grand! 🐰🎨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Qodana for JS

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [email protected]

@Wystov Wystov self-assigned this Jun 25, 2024
@Wystov Wystov marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2024 05:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f4df25 and eba5489.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/entities/courses/ui/course-card/course-card.scss (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/entities/courses/ui/course-card/course-card.scss

@Wystov Wystov merged commit 248cfb2 into main Jun 25, 2024
4 checks passed
@Wystov Wystov deleted the fix/299-focus-effect-differs-on-course-cards branch June 25, 2024 09:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2024
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Focus state is not consistent across course cards
4 participants