-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
564-refactor: Widget speakers #668
Conversation
Lighthouse Report:
|
Lighthouse Report:
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Quiddlee has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. β How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. π¦ How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. π Files selected for processing (3)
π Walkthroughπ WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files. A new constant Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.tsx (1)
40-44
: Consider combining className props.The className could be more concise.
-className={cx('right', 'picture')} +className={cx('picture')}Consider handling the 'right' positioning within the CSS module directly.
π Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (7)
src/shared/constants.ts
(1 hunks)src/shared/icons/email.tsx
(0 hunks)src/shared/icons/index.tsx
(0 hunks)src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.module.scss
(1 hunks)src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.scss
(0 hunks)src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.test.tsx
(3 hunks)src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.tsx
(2 hunks)
π€ Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- src/shared/icons/email.tsx
- src/shared/icons/index.tsx
- src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.scss
β Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/shared/constants.ts
- src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.module.scss
π Additional comments (6)
src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.test.tsx (3)
3-3
: LGTM! Import path update looks good.
36-38
: LGTM! Improved alt text for better accessibility.
23-23
: Verify test ID consistency with the Subtitle component.
The test now uses 'subtitle' test ID instead of 'contact-name'.
β Verification successful
Test ID 'subtitle' is correctly used in the Subtitle component
The Subtitle component consistently uses the test ID 'subtitle' in its implementation, matching the test's expectation.
π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Subtitle component consistently uses 'subtitle' as test ID
ast-grep --pattern 'const Subtitle = $$$' -A 10
Length of output: 869
src/widgets/speakers/ui/speakers.tsx (3)
1-13
: LGTM! Clean import organization and proper CSS modules setup.
Line range hint 16-32
: LGTM! Improved semantic HTML structure.
Good use of semantic tags (article) and components (Subtitle).
33-38
: LGTM! Email implementation follows best practices.
Good implementation of the mailto link with proper semantic structure.
run visual now |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Lighthouse Report:
|
What type of PR is this? (select all that apply)
Description
Related Tickets & Documents
Screenshots, Recordings
Added/updated tests?
[optional] Are there any post deployment tasks we need to perform?
[optional] What gif best describes this PR or how it makes you feel?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
RS_EMAIL
) to enhance contact functionality.Speakers
component with improved semantic HTML and styling practices.Bug Fixes
EmailIcon
component to streamline the codebase.Tests
Speakers
component tests.