669-fix: Deprication warnings in tests

[MielomankA]

What type of PR is this? (select all that apply)

• 🍕 Feature
• 🐛 Bug Fix
• 🚧 Breaking Change
• 🧑‍💻 Code Refactor
• 📝 Documentation Update

Description

https://sass-lang.com/documentation/breaking-changes/legacy-js-api/#bundlers
vitejs/vite#18164 (comment)
https://vite.dev/config/shared-options#css-preprocessoroptions

Related Tickets & Documents

• Related Issue Deprication warnings in tests #669
• Closes Deprication warnings in tests #669

Added/updated tests?

• 👌 Yes
• 🙅‍♂️ No, because they aren't needed
• 🙋‍♂️ No, because I need help

[optional] What gif best describes this PR or how it makes you feel?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added support for SCSS processing with the inclusion of the sass-embedded dependency.
  • Introduced new configuration options for CSS preprocessor settings in the testing framework.

• Chores

  • Updated dependency management in package.json to include the new sass-embedded dependency.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new dependency, "sass-embedded": "^1.82.0", to the devDependencies section of the package.json file, enhancing Sass processing capabilities. Additionally, the vitest.config.ts file has been updated to include a new css property with preprocessorOptions for the SCSS preprocessor, specifically setting the api option to 'modern-compiler'. No other modifications were made to existing configurations or dependencies.

Changes

File	Change Summary
package.json	Added "sass-embedded": "^1.82.0" to devDependencies.
vitest.config.ts	Added css property with preprocessorOptions for SCSS.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Console does not display warnings (#669)	❓	It is unclear if the new dependency resolves deprecation warnings.

Possibly related PRs

• 634-refactor: Fix sass deprecation warnings #635: Involves updating Sass import statements and adding a property to suppress deprecation warnings, which relates to the main PR's addition of a Sass processing dependency.

Suggested labels

refactor, high priority

Suggested reviewers

• dzmitry-varabei
• andron13
• ansivgit
• natanchik
• SpaNb4

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f8d88d and 33ace02.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• package.json

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Lighthouse Report:

• Performance: 52 / 100
• Accessibility: 99 / 100
• Best Practices: 100 / 100
• SEO: 100 / 100

View detailed report

[github-actions]

Lighthouse Report:

• Performance: 99 / 100
• Accessibility: 99 / 100
• Best Practices: 100 / 100
• SEO: 100 / 100

View detailed report