First review for translation of: Softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd #852

beatrizmilz · 2024-11-18T14:43:17Z

Review of the translation for this document: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ropensci/dev_guide/refs/heads/main/softwarereview_intro.Rmd

oh dear, sorry about that Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

* Add the submit response step In the author's response step there is no indication about submitting the comment to the bot * add Spanish * Update softwarereview_author.es.Rmd Co-authored-by: Joan Maspons <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

Editor dashboard for ropensci#828

* Removing twitter mention * Removing twitter from Spanish version

typo fix

)

…i#781) * Add PT-BR automatic translation maintenance_marketing.pt.Rmd * fix alias * fix yaml * Review for Portuguese translation of `maintenance_marketing.pt.Rmd` (ropensci#798) --------- Co-authored-by: Pedro Faria <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yanina Bellini Saibene <[email protected]>

* add translation * Review for Portuguese translation of `reviewtempate.Rmd` (ropensci#802) * Add translated version of template * Update templates/review.pt.md Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> * Update templates/review.pt.md Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> * Update templates/review.pt.md --------- Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pedro Faria <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]>

* automatic translation * Review for Portuguese translation of `newstemplate.Rmd` (ropensci#801) --------- Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pedro Faria <[email protected]>

* add translation * Review for Portuguese translation of `reviewrequesttemplate.Rmd` (ropensci#803) * Add review * Add review * Update templates/request.pt.md Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> * Update templates/request.pt.md Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> * Update templates/request.pt.md Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> * Update templates/request.pt.md Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pedro Faria <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]>

* improve reviewing guide * Update softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd Co-authored-by: mark padgham <[email protected]> * Update softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd Co-authored-by: mark padgham <[email protected]> * news item * es translation * pt translation * Update softwarereview_reviewer.es.Rmd Co-authored-by: Yanina Bellini Saibene <[email protected]> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Yanina Bellini Saibene <[email protected]> * Update softwarereview_reviewer.pt.Rmd --------- Co-authored-by: mark padgham <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yanina Bellini Saibene <[email protected]>

(ropensci#895) * add link to pkgcheck env vignette to close ropensci#589 * add br.pt translation for testenv update for ropensci#589 * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Francesca Palmeira <[email protected]> * Apply suggestions from code review --------- Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francesca Palmeira <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Yanina Bellini Saibene <[email protected]>

* Add PT-BR automatic translation pkg_security.pt.Rmd * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Ariana <[email protected]> * Apply suggestions from code review * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Francesca Palmeira <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Ariana <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Francesca Palmeira <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

…-review

beatrizmilz · 2025-04-18T18:28:58Z

There are some things that I'm noticing but I don't want to change the text, so I'll leave it as a comment here so it is easier for us to detect and discuss. Ok?

beatrizmilz · 2025-04-18T18:32:40Z

softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd


-Você pode reconhecer os pacotes do rOpenSci que foram revisados por pares por meio de um emblema verde "peer-reviewed" em seu README, com links para suas revisões (cf [este exemplo](https://github.com/ropensci/restez#locally-query-genbank-)); e por meio de um ícone de comentário azul próximo à sua descrição em [página de pacotes do rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/packages/) com links para as revisões.
+Você pode reconhecer os pacotes da rOpenSci que foram revisados por pares por meio de um selo (*badge*) verde com o texto "peer-reviewed" em seu README, com links para suas revisões ([por exemplo](https://github.com/ropensci/restez#locally-query-genbank-)); e por meio de um ícone de comentário azul próximo à sua descrição na [página de pacotes da rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/packages/) com links para as revisões.


It was quite difficult to understand what it meant in the translation.
I looked up on the website and this is an attempt to describe it a bit better.
But this is a change from the source book, I'm not sure how to proceed.

Suggested change

Você pode reconhecer os pacotes da rOpenSci que foram revisados por pares por meio de um selo (*badge*) verde com o texto "peer-reviewed" em seu README, com links para suas revisões ([por exemplo](https://github.com/ropensci/restez#locally-query-genbank-)); e por meio de um ícone de comentário azul próximo à sua descrição na [página de pacotes da rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/packages/) com links para as revisões.

Você pode reconhecer os pacotes da rOpenSci que foram revisados por pares por meio de um selo (*badge*) verde com o texto "peer-reviewed" em seu README, com links para suas revisões ([por exemplo](https://github.com/ropensci/restez#locally-query-genbank-)); e por meio de um botão azul com o texto *"Peer-reviewed"* próximo à sua descrição na [página de pacotes da rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/packages/) com links para as revisões.

beatrizmilz · 2025-04-18T18:34:24Z

softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd

@@ -44,20 +44,20 @@ Além disso, os autores e revisores podem entrar em contato com os editores em p

 - O LEIAME do seu pacote apresentará um selo de revisão por pares com um link para o tópico de revisão do software.
 - Seu pacote receberá um selo [`docs.ropensci.org` site de documentos](#rodocsci) que você pode vincular a partir da DESCRIÇÃO.
- O repositório do seu pacote será transferido para a organização rOpenSci.
+- Se você quiser, o repositório do seu pacote poderá ser transferido para a organização rOpenSci.


Making more clear what we mean by transfering to rOpenSci org.
But this is not in the English version, check how to proceed.

Suggested change

- Se você quiser, o repositório do seu pacote poderá ser transferido para a organização rOpenSci.

- Se você quiser, o repositório do seu pacote poderá ser transferido para a organização rOpenSci no GitHub.

…as-been-reviewed

beatrizmilz · 2025-04-18T19:44:36Z

softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd

+- O README do seu pacote apresentará um selo de revisão por pares com um link para o tópico de revisão do software.
+- Seu pacote terá um [site de documentação em `docs.ropensci.org`](#rodocsci) que você pode referenciar no DESCRIPTION.  
+- Se você quiser, o repositório do seu pacote poderá ser transferido para a organização rOpenSci.
+- Se os(as) revisores(as) [concordarem em ser listados(as) no DESCRIPTION](#authorship), seus metadados mencionarão a revisão.


The phrase is not 100% clear to me.
In "their metadata will mention the review.", "their metadata" is referring to the package metadata?
If so, we can make if more explicit:

Suggested change

- Se os(as) revisores(as) [concordarem em ser listados(as) no DESCRIPTION](#authorship), seus metadados mencionarão a revisão.

- Se os(as) revisores(as) [concordarem em ser listados(as) no DESCRIPTION](#authorship), os metadados do pacote mencionarão a revisão.

beatrizmilz · 2025-04-18T20:14:35Z

Hi! I have finished the first review of this chapter.

I have based the review of the translation for this document: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ropensci/dev_guide/refs/heads/main/softwarereview_intro.Rmd - there are some things that were diferent (probably because this branch was from some months ago) and I have used that file to check if anything needed to be updated.

I have left some comments in the translation so we can discuss.

I made the mistake of updating the branch to the source code, and now it shows with a lot of differences. But the only file that I have changed is softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd. I'm not sure what is the best practise in this case: maybe @yabellini can update this branch ropensci:softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd-pt-auto? Or do I create a new PR with only this file changed? Do I send in this PR #822 ? Or another idea?

@fblpalmeira is doing the second review, right?

yabellini · 2025-04-18T20:57:27Z

@beatrizmilz I updated the other branch, but it looks like this does not solve the problem (and even adds some conflicts).

To have a cleaner PR, can you create a new one that only has the changes to the file softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd ?

Thank you!

beatrizmilz · 2025-04-19T11:55:50Z

@beatrizmilz I updated the other branch, but it looks like this does not solve the problem (and even adds some conflicts).

To have a cleaner PR, can you create a new one that only has the changes to the file softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd ?

Thank you!

Hi Yani!
Thank you for the response. I have moved all the comments and suggestions to this existing PR: #822

Let me know if this works!

yabellini · 2025-04-19T13:33:05Z

@beatrizmilz Thank you! Yes it works! I will close this one now.

mpadge and others added 26 commits February 14, 2024 15:16

add editor note about pkgcheck rebuild times

f4dba13

more precise wording

00732c6

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/ropensci/dev_guide

2258a8f

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/ropensci/dev_guide

f5a089f

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/ropensci/dev_guide

ecc767e

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/ropensci/dev_guide

79938da

add dashboard link at top of editors chapter for ropensci#828

122df4f

more integration of dashboard in editor chapter for ropensci#828

f0d8d02

Update softwarereview_editor.Rmd

123cfcc

oh dear, sorry about that Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

Update softwarereview_editor.Rmd

2933e51

Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

Update softwarereview_editor.Rmd

593e7a3

Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

couple of suggestions from @maelle

82002af

rm trailing whitespace

ad9f127

update all dashboard URLs for ropensci#828

f112377

Merge pull request ropensci#829 from mpadge/dashboard

48c8701

Editor dashboard for ropensci#828

stop hardcoding editors' names (ropensci#833)

36fef51

Removing twitter mention (ropensci#827)

0c9c8a9

* Removing twitter mention * Removing twitter from Spanish version

typo fix

45682fd

Merge pull request ropensci#840 from ropensci/maelle-patch-4

ec72570

typo fix

update math (ropensci#838)

1476717

fix: remove Twitter link and update Adam's credentials :-) (ropensci#843

af1ed5c

)

Add PT-BR automatic translation newstemplate.Rmd (ropensci#776)

0fe005b

* automatic translation * Review for Portuguese translation of `newstemplate.Rmd` (ropensci#801) --------- Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pedro Faria <[email protected]>

Starting first review

df737f5

beatrizmilz changed the title ~~Softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd-pt-auto-review~~ First review for translation of: Softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd Nov 18, 2024

beatrizmilz changed the base branch from main to softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd-pt-auto November 18, 2024 14:45

yabellini and others added 2 commits November 18, 2024 11:49

pequenas alterações

3cad6ea

maelle and others added 8 commits April 7, 2025 14:36

Create CODEOWNERS (ropensci#905)

7fd116e

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd

7df02cd

Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>

Merge branch 'ropensci:main' into softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd-pt-auto…

423255e

…-review

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd - #softwarereviewintro

b79f04d

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd - softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd

71bed93

beatrizmilz commented Apr 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

beatrizmilz added 4 commits April 18, 2025 15:43

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd - #whyreview

6f1ee8e

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd - #whyreview

d6bee7f

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd - #whyopen

d1e5573

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd - #how-will-users-know-a-package-h…

8e23dcd

…as-been-reviewed

beatrizmilz commented Apr 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

Update softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd - {#editors-and-reviewers}

b562782

beatrizmilz marked this pull request as ready for review April 18, 2025 19:57

beatrizmilz added this to Tradução Português- Guia do programador Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz moved this to Todo - Automatic Translation in Tradução Português- Guia do programador Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz moved this from Todo - Automatic Translation to Todo - First Review in Tradução Português- Guia do programador Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz moved this from Todo - First Review to Todo - Second Review in Tradução Português- Guia do programador Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz marked this pull request as draft April 19, 2025 11:22

beatrizmilz mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2025

Add PT-BR automatic translation softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd #822

Open

yabellini closed this Apr 19, 2025

yabellini moved this from Todo - Second Review to Merged in Tradução Português- Guia do programador Apr 19, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

First review for translation of: Softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd #852

First review for translation of: Softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd #852

beatrizmilz commented Nov 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

beatrizmilz commented Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz commented Apr 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

yabellini commented Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz commented Apr 19, 2025

yabellini commented Apr 19, 2025


		Você pode reconhecer os pacotes do rOpenSci que foram revisados por pares por meio de um emblema verde "peer-reviewed" em seu README, com links para suas revisões (cf [este exemplo](https://github.com/ropensci/restez#locally-query-genbank-)); e por meio de um ícone de comentário azul próximo à sua descrição em [página de pacotes do rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/packages/) com links para as revisões.
		Você pode reconhecer os pacotes da rOpenSci que foram revisados por pares por meio de um selo (badge) verde com o texto "peer-reviewed" em seu README, com links para suas revisões ([por exemplo](https://github.com/ropensci/restez#locally-query-genbank-)); e por meio de um ícone de comentário azul próximo à sua descrição na [página de pacotes da rOpenSci](https://ropensci.org/packages/) com links para as revisões.

	- Se você quiser, o repositório do seu pacote poderá ser transferido para a organização rOpenSci.
	- Se você quiser, o repositório do seu pacote poderá ser transferido para a organização rOpenSci no GitHub.

	- Se os(as) revisores(as) [concordarem em ser listados(as) no DESCRIPTION](#authorship), seus metadados mencionarão a revisão.
	- Se os(as) revisores(as) [concordarem em ser listados(as) no DESCRIPTION](#authorship), os metadados do pacote mencionarão a revisão.

First review for translation of: Softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd #852

First review for translation of: Softwarereview_intro.pt.Rmd #852

Conversation

beatrizmilz commented Nov 18, 2024 • edited Loading

beatrizmilz commented Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz Apr 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

beatrizmilz Apr 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

beatrizmilz Apr 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

beatrizmilz commented Apr 18, 2025 • edited Loading

yabellini commented Apr 18, 2025

beatrizmilz commented Apr 19, 2025

yabellini commented Apr 19, 2025

beatrizmilz commented Nov 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

beatrizmilz commented Apr 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading