-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add expected size check for AR00 DL00 command from UAM protocol specification. #106
Open
richardw347
wants to merge
3
commits into
ros-drivers:ros2-devel
Choose a base branch
from
botsandus:packet_length_check
base: ros2-devel
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are these actually the same for all Hokuyo lasers? That seems unlikely to me, since different lasers have different number of readings per scan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding is these commands (AR00 and DL00) are separate from the SCIP2.0 protocol which the urg_library is based on and are exclusively part of the UAM protocol specification (for safety LIDARs of which the UAM-05LP is the only one). I've attached the protocol spec.
UAM05LP_CommunicationSpecification_en_2_4_0_r1.pdf
Hence my confidence in setting these as fixed values as anyone using these detailed status commands would need to be doing it with a UAM-05LP scanner as non-safety scanners wouldn't support the UAM commands. It's a bit of a hack the way it's been implemented at the moment effectively switching protocols mid stream to get the safety data and then going back to SCIP to get the scan data again.
Ideally for safety scanners you'd switch to using the UAM protocol exclusively but that's a much bigger project as it would be good to integrate it into the urg_c library.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Happy to leave it open for people to chime in with other experiences.
As a middle ground we can also set the limit to the maximum string index AR00 and DL00 update functions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That seems reasonable - I'm traveling for a few days - but I will test this out on the couple different Hokuyos I have when I get home next week to make sure it works as expected on the lower end lasers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've got a UST-10LX at home and ran a quick check, as expected with detailed_status = true the command fails and returns an empty packet. You do get some nasty socket errors though and node doesn't recover well.
I just pushed a quick product name get to the detailed_status branch of the getStatus() function which gives a nice friendly warning if the command isn't supported.
Let me know what you think?