Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update testnet validation period duration and activation age #2904

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: remove_similar_isSvpOngoing_method
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

julia-zack
Copy link
Contributor

The current activation age in testnet is set to 120 RSK blocks, and the svp validation period to 80 blocks. This is going to be insufficient to complete the SVP validations.

A safe value to ensure that the SVP has enough time to be validated is 2000 RSK blocks.
This change implies also update the activation age just for testnet.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails

Scanned Manifest Files

@julia-zack julia-zack force-pushed the update_testnet_activation_age branch from 8a8662e to 163b160 Compare December 23, 2024 17:58
@julia-zack julia-zack force-pushed the update_testnet_activation_age branch from 163b160 to d0bcdec Compare January 2, 2025 14:35
@julia-zack julia-zack marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2025 14:36
@julia-zack julia-zack requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 14:36
@julia-zack julia-zack force-pushed the update_testnet_activation_age branch from d0bcdec to 6ca295e Compare January 2, 2025 15:09
@julia-zack julia-zack force-pushed the update_testnet_activation_age branch from 6ca295e to a85f772 Compare January 2, 2025 15:17
Copy link
Contributor

@apancorb apancorb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job!

Copy link
Contributor

@jeremy-then jeremy-then left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants