feat: onboarded XPixel Integration #1783
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/XPixel/constants.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/client_server_name.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/config_to_integration_names.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/integration_cname.js (2 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/nativeSdkLoader.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/utils.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/client_server_name.js
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/config_to_integration_names.js
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/index.js
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/nativeSdkLoader.js (1)
Learnt from: saikumarrs PR: rudderlabs/rudder-sdk-js#1708 File: packages/analytics-js/__tests__/nativeSdkLoader.js:31-33 Timestamp: 2024-05-20T04:18:55.216Z Learning: The loading snippet in `packages/analytics-js/__tests__/nativeSdkLoader.js` is a standard part of the SDK, and no changes are desired on it.
Biome
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/nativeSdkLoader.js
[error] 6-9: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 6-9: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 10-10: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 11-11: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 12-12: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 13-13: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 14-14: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 15-15: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Additional comments not posted (13)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/XPixel/constants.js (3)
1-3: LGTM!The constants
DIR_NAME,NAME, andDISPLAY_NAMEare correctly defined.
5-13: LGTM!The mappings
DISPLAY_NAME_TO_DIR_NAME_MAPandCNameMappingare correctly defined and appropriately named.
15-52: LGTM!The
trackPropertyMappingis correctly defined and covers all necessary properties for tracking.packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js (5)
10-23: LGTM!The constructor correctly initializes the
XPixelinstance with the provided configuration, analytics, and destination information.
26-28: LGTM!The
initmethod correctly loads the native SDK using the providedpixelId.
30-32: LGTM!The
isLoadedmethod correctly checks if the Twitter SDK script has been loaded.
34-36: LGTM!The
isReadymethod correctly checks if the SDK is ready by callingisLoaded.
38-51: Ensure event name and properties are valid before tracking.The
trackmethod should validate the event name and properties before sending them to the Twitter SDK to avoid potential errors.if (!event) { logger.error('Event name is missing'); return; } if (properties) { properties.isRudderEvents = true; window.twq.track(event, properties); } else { window.twq.track(event, { isRudderEvents: true }); }packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/utils.js (2)
5-23: LGTM!The
getContentsfunction correctly constructs the contents array from the message properties.
25-45: LGTM!The
getTrackResponsefunction correctly constructs the tracking response payload from the message properties.packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js (2)
79-79: Import statement approved.The import statement for
XPixelfollows the consistent structure seen throughout the file.
162-162: Addition to integrations object approved.The addition of
XPIXELto theintegrationsobject follows the consistent structure and naming conventions seen throughout the file.packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/integration_cname.js (1)
79-79: Import statement and addition to commonNames approved.The import statement for
XPixeland its addition to thecommonNamesobject follow the consistent structure and naming conventions seen throughout the file.
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/nativeSdkLoader.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1783 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 56.70% 56.79% +0.09%
===========================================
Files 473 476 +3
Lines 16121 16191 +70
Branches 3233 3226 -7
===========================================
+ Hits 9141 9196 +55
- Misses 5713 5779 +66
+ Partials 1267 1216 -51 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
size-limit report 📦
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js
Additional comments not posted (4)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (4)
1-1: Import statement looks good.The
XPixelclass is imported correctly from the expected path.
3-5: Good practice: Restoring mocks after tests.The
afterAllblock ensures that all mocks are restored after the tests run.
6-9: ConstantdestinationInfolooks good.The
destinationInfoobject is well-formed and provides necessary information for theXPixelintegration.
11-29: Configuration and test case look good.The
basicConfigobject is well-formed and provides necessary configuration for theXPixelintegration. The test case checks if theinitmethod works as expected by verifying thetwqobject.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
anantjain45823
requested review from
ItsSudip,
shrouti1507,
sandeepdsvs,
koladilip and
a team
as code owners
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/utils.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/utils.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/utils.js
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/client_server_name.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/config_to_integration_names.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/integration_cname.js (2 hunks)
- sonar-project.properties (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- sonar-project.properties
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/client_server_name.js
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/config_to_integration_names.js
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/integration_cname.js
[warning] 80-80: packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/integration_cname.js#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/integration_cname.js (2)
80-80: Ensure test coverage for the new import.The import statement for
XPixelis correctly formatted. However, it lacks test coverage.Verification successful
The import statement for
XPixelis correctly formatted and adequately covered by tests.
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.jscontains multiple references toXPixelindicating test coverage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the new import `XPixel` is covered by tests. # Test: Search for test cases that include `XPixel`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type python -A 5 $'XPixel'Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the new import `XPixel` is covered by tests. # Test: Search for test cases that include `XPixel`. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg -A 5 $'XPixel'Length of output: 12855
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 80-80: packages/analytics-js-common/src/v1.1/utils/integration_cname.js#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
164-164: Ensure test coverage for the new integration.The inclusion of
XPixelin thecommonNamesobject is correctly formatted. However, it lacks test coverage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (13)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js (6)
12-26: Constructor initializes class properties correctly.The constructor initializes the class properties and sets the log level if provided. No issues found.
28-30: Initialization method loads the native SDK.The
initmethod correctly calls theloadNativeSdkfunction with the pixel ID.
32-34: isLoaded method correctly checks for SDK load status.The
isLoadedmethod returns a boolean indicating if the Twitter Pixel SDK is loaded.
36-38: isReady method correctly checks readiness.The
isReadymethod returns the result ofisLoaded, indicating if the SDK is ready.
51-56: Page method correctly handles page view events.The
pagemethod sets the event to 'Page View', retrieves properties, maps events, and sends the event usingsendEvent.Ensure that 'Page View' is mapped correctly in
eventsMapping.
40-49: Track method correctly handles event tracking.The
trackmethod verifies the event, retrieves properties, maps events, and sends the event usingsendEvent.However, ensure that all event names in
eventsMappingare valid and mapped correctly.packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/XPixel/browser.test.js (7)
34-40: Initialization test case correctly verifies SDK load and readiness.The test case for
XPixelinitialization checks if the SDK function is defined and if the SDK is ready. No issues found.
51-69: Page view test case correctly verifies event tracking.The test case for the
pagemethod verifies the calls made totwqwith the correct event IDs and properties. No issues found.
75-125: Track simple event test case correctly verifies event tracking.The test case for tracking a simple event verifies the call made to
twqwith the correct event ID and properties, including product details. No issues found.
127-169: Track product added event test case correctly verifies event tracking.The test case for tracking a product added event verifies the call made to
twqwith the correct event ID and properties, including product details. No issues found.
171-183: Track event with empty properties test case correctly verifies event tracking.The test case for tracking an event with empty properties verifies the call made to
twqwith the correct event ID and empty properties. No issues found.
186-198: Track event with no event name test case correctly verifies no event tracking.The test case for tracking an event with no event name verifies that no call is made to
twq. No issues found.
200-213: Track event with no event ID test case correctly verifies no event tracking.The test case for tracking an event with no event ID verifies that no call is made to
twq. No issues found.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/client_server_name.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/config_to_integration_names.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js (2 hunks)
- sonar-project.properties (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/client_server_name.js
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/config_to_integration_names.js
Additional comments not posted (4)
sonar-project.properties (2)
23-23: LGTM! The exclusion patterns are correctly formatted.The added exclusion patterns for specific JavaScript files are appropriate and improve the accuracy of the SonarQube analysis.
31-31: LGTM! The coverage exclusion patterns are correctly formatted.The added coverage exclusion patterns for specific JavaScript files are appropriate and improve the accuracy of the SonarQube analysis.
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js (2)
80-80: LGTM! The import statement is correctly formatted.The import statement for
CNameMappingforXPixelis appropriate and aligns with the existing imports.
164-164: LGTM! The addition to thecommonNamesobject is correctly formatted.The addition of
XPixelto thecommonNamesobject is appropriate and aligns with the existing structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/XPixel/browser.js
aanshi07
dismissed stale reviews from anantjain45823, shrouti1507, and coderabbitai[bot]
via
a8d5fd3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- sonar-project.properties (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- sonar-project.properties
|
PR Description
X(Twitter) Inetgration - Device mode
Linear task (optional)
INT-574
Cross Browser Tests
Please confirm you have tested for the following browsers:
Sanity Suite
Security
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
XPixelintegration for enhanced event tracking and page view management.XPixel.Chores