feat: gainsight PX destination (#1852) #1889
Conversation
* feat: gainsight PX destination * feat: Gainsight PX destination PR Feedback - changed name to use existing name * feat: gainsight PX destination PR feedback - Switched to use integration options instead of extra config object. Cleaned up identify * feat: gainsight PX destination PR feedback - Use integration config * feat: gainsight PX destination fixed typo on us2 datacenter URL
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1889 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 57.34% 57.43% +0.08%
===========================================
Files 482 485 +3
Lines 16417 16479 +62
Branches 3294 3292 -2
===========================================
+ Hits 9414 9464 +50
- Misses 5725 5750 +25
+ Partials 1278 1265 -13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces updates to the Gainsight PX integration within the analytics-js-common and analytics-js-integrations packages. New entries are added to various constants files, including client-server names and integration mappings. Additionally, a comprehensive suite of unit tests is introduced to validate the functionality of the Gainsight PX class, ensuring that key methods operate correctly. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts (4)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The constants
DIR_NAME,NAME, andDISPLAY_NAMEare well-defined and consistent with other integration naming conventions. They accurately represent the Gainsight PX integration.Consider adding test coverage for these constants to ensure they are correctly exported and maintain their expected values.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-3: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L1-L3
Added lines #L1 - L3 were not covered by tests
5-5: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The
DISPLAY_NAME_TO_DIR_NAME_MAPconstant correctly maps the display name to the directory name, which is consistent with the previously defined constants.It's recommended to add test coverage for this mapping to ensure it remains accurate, especially if it's used for internal routing or configuration purposes.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 5-6: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L5-L6
Added lines #L5 - L6 were not covered by tests
12-12: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage for exports.The export statement correctly includes all defined constants and mappings, making them available for use in other parts of the codebase.
It's recommended to add test coverage for these exports to ensure that all expected values are correctly exported and available for use in other modules.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 12-12: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L12
Added line #L12 was not covered by tests
1-12: Overall, well-structured constants file for Gainsight PX integration.This file effectively defines and exports the necessary constants and mappings for the Gainsight PX integration. The constants are well-named, and the mappings provide flexibility in handling different input formats. The structure is consistent with best practices for integration constants.
While the individual components look good, consider improving overall test coverage for this file to ensure long-term maintainability and catch any potential issues with constant values or exports.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-3: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L1-L3
Added lines #L1 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 5-6: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L5-L6
Added lines #L5 - L6 were not covered by tests
[warning] 12-12: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L12
Added line #L12 was not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/utils.js (1)
6-15: LGTM: Well-implemented utility function with clear documentationThe
getDestinationOptionsfunction is well-implemented and thoroughly documented. It provides a clean way to retrieve destination-specific options with a fallback for backward compatibility.Minor suggestion: Consider using optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators for a more concise implementation:
const getDestinationOptions = integrationsOptions => integrationsOptions?.[DISPLAY_NAME] ?? integrationsOptions?.[NAME];This change would maintain the same functionality while potentially improving readability.
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/nativeSdkLoader.js (2)
4-13: Consider adding error handling for invaliddataCentervalues.The switch statement for selecting hostnames based on the
dataCenterparameter is clear. However, it doesn't handle cases where an invaliddataCentervalue is provided.Consider adding a default case to handle unexpected
dataCentervalues:switch (dataCenter) { case 'EU': hostName = 'web-sdk-eu.aptrinsic.com'; break; case 'US2': hostName = 'web-sdk-us2.aptrinsic.com'; break; + default: + console.warn(`Unknown dataCenter: ${dataCenter}. Using default hostname.`); }
13-26: LGTM: SDK loading mechanism is well-implemented.The SDK URL construction and the IIFE setup for asynchronous loading are implemented correctly. The queue mechanism for SDK commands is a good practice.
Consider using template literals for better readability in URL construction:
-const sdkUrl= "https://" + hostName + "/api/aptrinsic.js"; +const sdkUrl = `https://${hostName}/api/aptrinsic.js`;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 18-18: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js (4)
76-79: Optimize by checkinguserIdbefore constructingvisitorObjIn the
identify()method, you're constructingvisitorObjbefore verifying ifuserIdexists. To avoid unnecessary computation, consider moving theif (!userId)check before constructingvisitorObj.Apply this diff:
66 let visitorObj = {}; 67 const accountObj = {}; 68 const { userId, context } = rudderElement.message; 69 const id = userId; + if (!userId) { + return; + } 70 const userTraits = context?.traits || {}; 71 visitorObj = { 72 id, 73 ...userTraits, 74 }; - if (!userId) { - return; - }🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 77-77: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L77
Added line #L77 was not covered by tests
[warning] 79-79: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L79
Added line #L79 was not covered by tests
90-93: InitializeaccountObjconsistentlyYou're assigning
accountObj.iddirectly in line 90 and then reassigningaccountObjin line 91. To ensure clarity and avoid potential overwrites, consider constructingaccountObjin a single step.Apply this diff:
87 let accountObj = {}; 88 let visitorObj = {}; 89 const { userId, traits, context, groupId, anonymousId } = rudderElement.message; - accountObj.id = groupId || anonymousId; - accountObj = { + accountObj = { + id: groupId || anonymousId, ...traits, };🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 91-91: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L91
Added line #L91 was not covered by tests
109-116: Handle scenarios wherepropertiesmight be undefined intrack()methodIn the
track()method,propertiescould be undefined if not provided. To prevent potential errors, ensure thatpropsdefaults to an empty object ifpropertiesis undefined.Apply this diff:
114 const props = properties; + const props = properties || {};🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 109-109: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L109
Added line #L109 was not covered by tests
[warning] 111-112: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L111-L112
Added lines #L111 - L112 were not covered by tests
[warning] 114-115: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L114-L115
Added lines #L114 - L115 were not covered by tests
16-16: Increase test coverage for critical methodsSeveral key methods and lines are not covered by tests, as indicated by static analysis tools. To enhance reliability and prevent future regressions, consider adding unit tests for the following:
- Setting the logger's log level in the constructor (line 16)
- The
init()method (lines 31-32)- The
initializeMe()method and its conditional logic (lines 36, 40, 42-47)- The
isReady()method (line 56)- The
identify()method, especially the early return andwindow.aptrinsiccall (lines 66-69, 77-79)- The
group()method and its object constructions (lines 87-89, 91, 98, 104)- The
track()method, including error logging wheneventis missing (lines 109, 111-112, 114-115)Also applies to: 31-32, 36-36, 40-40, 42-42, 47-47, 56-56, 66-69, 77-79, 87-89, 91-91, 98-98, 104-104, 109-109, 111-112, 114-115
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 16-16: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L16
Added line #L16 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/client_server_name.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/config_to_integration_names.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destDisplayNamesToFileNamesMap.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js (2 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/nativeSdkLoader.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/utils.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/index.js
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/nativeSdkLoader.js (1)
Learnt from: saikumarrs PR: rudderlabs/rudder-sdk-js#1708 File: packages/analytics-js/__tests__/nativeSdkLoader.js:31-33 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:52:59.819Z Learning: The loading snippet in `packages/analytics-js/__tests__/nativeSdkLoader.js` is a standard part of the SDK, and no changes are desired on it.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts
[warning] 1-3: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L1-L3
Added lines #L1 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 5-6: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L5-L6
Added lines #L5 - L6 were not covered by tests
[warning] 12-12: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts#L12
Added line #L12 was not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts
[warning] 293-295: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts#L293-L295
Added lines #L293 - L295 were not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js
[warning] 81-81: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js#L81
Added line #L81 was not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js
[warning] 16-16: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L16
Added line #L16 was not covered by tests
[warning] 31-32: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L31-L32
Added lines #L31 - L32 were not covered by tests
[warning] 36-36: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L36
Added line #L36 was not covered by tests
[warning] 40-40: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L40
Added line #L40 was not covered by tests
[warning] 42-42: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by tests
[warning] 47-47: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by tests
[warning] 56-56: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L56
Added line #L56 was not covered by tests
[warning] 66-69: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L66-L69
Added lines #L66 - L69 were not covered by tests
[warning] 71-71: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L71
Added line #L71 was not covered by tests
[warning] 77-77: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L77
Added line #L77 was not covered by tests
[warning] 79-79: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L79
Added line #L79 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-89: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L87-L89
Added lines #L87 - L89 were not covered by tests
[warning] 91-91: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L91
Added line #L91 was not covered by tests
[warning] 98-98: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
[warning] 104-104: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L104
Added line #L104 was not covered by tests
[warning] 109-109: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L109
Added line #L109 was not covered by tests
[warning] 111-112: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L111-L112
Added lines #L111 - L112 were not covered by tests
[warning] 114-115: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L114-L115
Added lines #L114 - L115 were not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js
[warning] 80-80: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
🪛 Biome
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js
[error] 52-52: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/nativeSdkLoader.js
[error] 18-18: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/GainsightPX/constants.ts (1)
6-10: LGTM! Comprehensive name mapping.The
CNameMappingconstant provides a robust mapping for various forms of the integration name (uppercase, PascalCase, and lowercase) to the standardizedNAMEconstant. This approach ensures flexible input handling while maintaining a consistent internal representation.packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/utils.js (3)
1-4: LGTM: Well-structured import statementThe import statement is clean and follows best practices. It imports specific constants from a common file, which promotes code reuse and maintainability.
17-17: LGTM: Proper export of the utility functionThe export statement correctly uses named exports, making the
getDestinationOptionsfunction available for use in other modules. This follows best practices for module exports in JavaScript.
1-17: Overall: Well-implemented utility module for GainsightPX integrationThis new utility module is well-structured and provides a valuable function for retrieving destination-specific options in the GainsightPX integration. The code is clean, well-documented, and considers backward compatibility. It follows best practices for imports, function implementation, and exports.
Great job on this implementation! The only suggestion is to consider using optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators for a slightly more concise function body, but this is a minor optimization.
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/nativeSdkLoader.js (4)
1-3: LGTM: Import and function signature are well-defined.The import of
LOAD_ORIGINand theloadNativeSdkfunction signature with parametersproductKey,dataCenter, andpxConfigare appropriate for the Gainsight PX integration.
29-29: LGTM: Export statement is correct.The
loadNativeSdkfunction is properly exported using ES6 module syntax.
18-18: Note on static analysis warning: Assignment in expression is acceptable in this context.The static analysis tool flags the assignment
n[i].q=n[i].q||[]as a potential issue. While assignments in expressions can sometimes lead to confusion, this pattern is common and acceptable in SDK loader scripts. It efficiently initializes the queue for SDK commands.No changes are necessary, but for clarity, you could consider refactoring to:
n[i].q = n[i].q || []; n[i].q.push(arguments);However, the current implementation is concise and widely used in similar contexts.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 18-18: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
1-29: Overall assessment: Well-implemented SDK loader with minor improvement suggestions.The
nativeSdkLoader.jsfile provides a solid implementation for loading the Gainsight PX SDK. It follows common patterns for SDK loaders, including asynchronous loading and command queueing. The code is generally well-structured and clear.A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Adding error handling for invalid
dataCentervalues.- Using template literals for URL construction.
- Optionally refactoring the assignment in the expression for clarity.
These suggestions are minor and don't affect the core functionality. The implementation is approved and ready for use, pending the suggested minor enhancements.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 18-18: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/config_to_integration_names.js (1)
83-83: LGTM! Verify usage of the new integration.The addition of
GAINSIGHT_PX: 'GainsightPX'to theconfigToIntNamesobject is correct and follows the established naming convention. This change aligns with the PR objective of introducing a new destination integration for Gainsight PX.To ensure the new integration is properly referenced, run the following script:
This script will help verify that the new integration is properly referenced and used across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The
GAINSIGHT_PXintegration is correctly implemented and properly referenced throughout the codebase. No unintended or inconsistent usages were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new Gainsight PX integration across the codebase. # Test 1: Search for 'GAINSIGHT_PX' usage echo "Searching for 'GAINSIGHT_PX' usage:" rg --type js --type ts 'GAINSIGHT_PX' # Test 2: Search for 'GainsightPX' class or import statements echo "Searching for 'GainsightPX' class or import statements:" rg --type js --type ts '(class\s+GainsightPX|import.*GainsightPX)' # Test 3: Search for Gainsight PX configuration echo "Searching for Gainsight PX configuration:" rg --type js --type ts 'gainsightPx|gainsight_px'Length of output: 1250
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for 'GainsightPX' and related configurations across all file types. # Test 4: Search for 'gainsightPx' or 'gainsight_px' in all files echo "Searching for 'gainsightPx' or 'gainsight_px' in all files:" rg 'gainsightPx|gainsight_px' # Test 5: Search for any variations of 'GainsightPX' in documentation or configuration files echo "Searching for variations of 'GainsightPX' in documentation or configuration files:" rg --type md --type json --type yaml 'GainsightPX|gainsightPx|gainsight_px'Length of output: 431
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/client_server_name.js (1)
82-82: LGTM: Gainsight PX integration added successfully.The addition of the Gainsight PX integration to the
clientToServerNamesobject is correct and consistent with the existing entries. This change aligns perfectly with the PR objective of introducing a new destination integration for Gainsight PX within the Rudder SDK for JavaScript.packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js (2)
80-80: LGTM: Import statement for GainsightPX is correct and consistent.The import statement for GainsightPX follows the established pattern in this file and is correctly placed at the end of the import list.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 80-80: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
164-164: LGTM: GAINSIGHT_PX integration added correctly.The GAINSIGHT_PX integration is correctly added to the
integrationsobject, following the established pattern and naming convention.However, there's a code coverage warning for this line. To address this:
Please ensure that unit tests are added or updated to cover the new GAINSIGHT_PX integration. You can verify the coverage by running the following command:
If no test files are found or if GAINSIGHT_PX is not used in existing tests, consider adding appropriate test coverage for this integration.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: GAINSIGHT_PX integration added correctly.
The GAINSIGHT_PX integration is correctly added to the
integrationsobject, following the established pattern and naming convention. Existing tests import and utilize GAINSIGHT_PX, ensuring appropriate test coverage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the GAINSIGHT_PX integration # Test: Search for test files related to GAINSIGHT_PX echo "Searching for GAINSIGHT_PX test files:" fd --type file --extension test.js --extension spec.js | rg -i gainsightpx # Test: Check if GAINSIGHT_PX is imported and used in existing test files echo "\nChecking usage of GAINSIGHT_PX in existing test files:" rg -i "import.*gainsightpx" $(fd --type file --extension test.js --extension spec.js)Length of output: 5173
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js (2)
81-81: LGTM: New import for GainsightPX added correctly.The import statement for GainsightPX is correctly formatted and consistent with other imports in the file. It's also placed at the end of the import list, maintaining the alphabetical order.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 81-81: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js#L81
Added line #L81 was not covered by tests
166-166: LGTM: GainsightPX added to commonNames object correctly.The addition of GainsightPX to the
commonNamesobject is done correctly using the spread operator, consistent with other entries. The placement at the end of the object maintains the alphabetical order.However, the static analysis tool indicates that this new line is not covered by tests.
To ensure the robustness of the integration, please add or update tests to cover this new addition. You can verify the test coverage by running the following command:
This will help identify existing test files where you can add coverage for the new GainsightPX integration.
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destDisplayNamesToFileNamesMap.ts (3)
161-162: LGTM: New imports for GainsightPX added correctly.The new imports for
GainsightPXDisplayNameandGainsightPXDirectoryNameare consistent with the existing naming conventions and are correctly placed at the end of the import list, maintaining alphabetical order.
246-246: LGTM: New entry for GainsightPX added correctly to the mapping object.The new entry
[GainsightPXDisplayName]: GainsightPXDirectoryName,is consistent with the existing structure of thedestDisplayNamesToFileNamesMapobject. It's correctly placed at the end of the object, maintaining alphabetical order.
Line range hint
1-248: Overall assessment: Changes for GainsightPX integration are well-implemented.The additions for the GainsightPX integration in this file are minimal, focused, and consistent with the existing code structure and naming conventions. The new imports and mapping entry are correctly placed and follow the established patterns in the file. These changes effectively integrate GainsightPX into the existing destination mapping system without introducing any apparent issues or inconsistencies.
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js (3)
31-31: Verify thatloadNativeSdkhandles an emptyproductKeyIn the
init()method,loadNativeSdkis called withthis.productKey. Ensure thatloadNativeSdkproperly handles cases whereproductKeymight be an empty string. If not, this could lead to initialization failures or unexpected behavior.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 31-32: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L31-L32
Added lines #L31 - L32 were not covered by tests
87-105: Ensure correct handling whenuserIdis undefined ingroup()methodIn the
group()method, ifuserIdis not present,visitorObjremains an empty object. When callingwindow.aptrinsic('identify', visitorObj, accountObj);, confirm that passing an emptyvisitorObjaligns with Gainsight PX SDK expectations. If an emptyvisitorObjis not acceptable, adjust the implementation accordingly.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 87-89: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L87-L89
Added lines #L87 - L89 were not covered by tests
[warning] 91-91: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L91
Added line #L91 was not covered by tests
[warning] 98-98: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
[warning] 104-104: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L104
Added line #L104 was not covered by tests
96-102: Consider constructingvisitorObjeven whenuserIdis undefinedIn the
group()method, ifuserIdis not present,visitorObjremains empty. Depending on the SDK's requirements, you might still want to pass user traits associated with an anonymous user. Verify if the SDK supports this and adjust the logic if necessary.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 98-98: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/GainsightPX/browser.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
size-limit report 📦
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts (4)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The constants are well-defined and follow appropriate naming conventions. The values accurately represent the Gainsight PX integration.
To improve the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase, consider adding unit tests to cover these constants. This will help ensure their values remain correct as the codebase evolves.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-3: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L1-L3
Added lines #L1 - L3 were not covered by tests
5-9: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage for mappings.The mapping objects are well-defined and serve clear purposes:
DISPLAY_NAME_TO_DIR_NAME_MAPprovides an easy lookup for the directory name using the display name.CNameMappingnormalizes different variations of the integration name.The use of computed property names in
DISPLAY_NAME_TO_DIR_NAME_MAPis a good practice for dynamic key creation.To ensure the integrity of these mappings over time, consider adding unit tests that verify the correct associations between keys and values in both objects.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 5-6: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L5-L6
Added lines #L5 - L6 were not covered by tests
11-11: LGTM! Consider integration testing for exports.The export statement correctly makes all defined constants and mappings available for use in other parts of the application.
While the export statement itself doesn't require direct testing, ensure that the usage of these exports in other parts of the application is covered by integration or unit tests. This will help verify that the constants and mappings are correctly imported and used throughout the codebase.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 11-11: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L11
Added line #L11 was not covered by tests
1-11: Overall assessment: Well-structured constants file with room for improved test coverage.This file successfully introduces the necessary constants and mappings for the Gainsight PX integration. The code is well-organized, follows good naming conventions, and uses appropriate data structures.
To further enhance the quality and maintainability of this file:
- Add unit tests to cover the constant values and mapping objects.
- Ensure that the usage of these exports is covered by integration tests in the relevant parts of the application.
These improvements will help maintain the integrity of the constants and mappings as the codebase evolves.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1-3: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L1-L3
Added lines #L1 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 5-6: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L5-L6
Added lines #L5 - L6 were not covered by tests
[warning] 11-11: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L11
Added line #L11 was not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/utils.js (1)
6-15: LGTM: Well-implemented utility function with clear documentationThe
getDestinationOptionsfunction is concise, efficient, and well-documented. It correctly handles potential undefined inputs and provides a fallback mechanism for backward compatibility.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding type checking for the
integrationsOptionsparameter to ensure it's an object when defined. This could prevent potential runtime errors if the function is called with unexpected input types.const getDestinationOptions = integrationsOptions => - integrationsOptions && (integrationsOptions[DISPLAY_NAME] || integrationsOptions[NAME]); + integrationsOptions && typeof integrationsOptions === 'object' + ? (integrationsOptions[DISPLAY_NAME] || integrationsOptions[NAME]) + : undefined;This change would ensure that the function always returns
undefinedifintegrationsOptionsis not an object, maintaining consistent behavior across all input types.packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js (4)
9-38: LGTM: Test setup is comprehensiveThe test setup is well-structured and follows best practices for Jest testing. The mock objects cover all necessary properties and methods for the Gainsight_PX integration.
Minor suggestion: Consider using
beforeAllto set up thewindow.aptrinsicmock, as it doesn't change between tests. This could slightly improve test performance.
40-66: LGTM: 'init' tests cover main scenariosThe 'init' tests effectively cover the main scenarios for initializing the Gainsight_PX integration. The expectations are clear and specific, ensuring that the native SDK is loaded correctly and the identify method is called appropriately.
Suggestion: Consider adding a test case for when the group ID is present but the user ID is not. This would ensure that the integration handles all possible combinations of user and group data during initialization.
68-172: LGTM: Comprehensive tests for 'identify', 'group', and 'track' methodsThe tests for 'identify', 'group', and 'track' methods are thorough and well-structured. They cover both positive scenarios and edge cases, ensuring that the Gainsight_PX integration behaves correctly under various conditions.
Suggestion: Consider adding tests for error handling scenarios. For example, test how the integration behaves if the
window.aptrinsicfunction throws an error. This would ensure that the integration gracefully handles unexpected issues with the Gainsight PX SDK.
1-173: Overall: Excellent test coverage with room for minor improvementsThis test file provides comprehensive coverage for the Gainsight_PX integration, including all main methods ('init', 'identify', 'group', and 'track'). The tests are well-organized, follow Jest best practices, and effectively use mocks and beforeEach blocks to ensure consistent test environments.
Suggestion for improvement: Consider grouping the test data (like rudderElement objects) into a separate file or constant objects at the top of the file. This would improve readability and make it easier to maintain and update test data across multiple test cases.
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js (1)
89-94: Rename 'traits' to 'groupTraits' for clarityIn the
groupmethod, usingtraitsto represent group traits might cause confusion with user traits. RenamingtraitstogroupTraitsenhances code readability.Apply this diff to improve variable naming:
const { userId, traits, context, groupId, anonymousId } = rudderElement.message; + const groupTraits = traits; accountObj = { ...accountObj, - ...traits, + ...groupTraits, };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/client_server_name.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/config_to_integration_names.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destDisplayNamesToFileNamesMap.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js (2 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/nativeSdkLoader.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/utils.js (1 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/index.js
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/client_server_name.js
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/config_to_integration_names.js
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destDisplayNamesToFileNamesMap.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/nativeSdkLoader.js (1)
Learnt from: saikumarrs PR: rudderlabs/rudder-sdk-js#1708 File: packages/analytics-js/__tests__/nativeSdkLoader.js:31-33 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:52:59.819Z Learning: The loading snippet in `packages/analytics-js/__tests__/nativeSdkLoader.js` is a standard part of the SDK, and no changes are desired on it.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts
[warning] 1-3: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L1-L3
Added lines #L1 - L3 were not covered by tests
[warning] 5-6: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L5-L6
Added lines #L5 - L6 were not covered by tests
[warning] 11-11: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/constants.ts#L11
Added line #L11 was not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts
[warning] 293-295: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts#L293-L295
Added lines #L293 - L295 were not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js
[warning] 81-81: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js#L81
Added line #L81 was not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js
[warning] 56-56: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js#L56
Added line #L56 was not covered by testspackages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js
[warning] 80-80: packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/index.js#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
🪛 Biome
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js
[error] 52-52: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/nativeSdkLoader.js
[error] 18-18: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/utils.js (2)
1-4: LGTM: Well-structured import statementThe import statement is clean and follows best practices. It imports only the necessary constants (NAME and DISPLAY_NAME) from a dedicated constants file, which suggests good code organization.
17-17: LGTM: Proper export statementThe export statement correctly uses a named export for the
getDestinationOptionsfunction. This approach aligns with best practices for module exports and maintains clear, explicit imports in files that will use this utility.packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/nativeSdkLoader.js (3)
1-3: LGTM: Import and function signature are well-defined.The import of
LOAD_ORIGINand theloadNativeSdkfunction signature are correctly implemented. The function parameters (productKey,dataCenter, andpxConfig) provide the necessary flexibility for different configurations.
15-26: LGTM: SDK loading mechanism is well-implemented.The IIFE approach for setting up the SDK loading mechanism is a good practice. It properly initializes the
aptrinsicobject on the globalwindowobject and sets up a queue for commands before the SDK is fully loaded. The script element creation and insertion are correctly implemented, including the setting of thedata-loaderattribute.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 18-18: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
29-29: LGTM: Export statement is correct.The export of the
loadNativeSdkfunction is properly implemented using the ES6 module syntax. This allows for easy importing and usage of the function in other parts of the codebase.packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js (1)
1-7: LGTM: Imports and mocks are well-structuredThe imports and mocks are appropriately set up for testing the Gainsight_PX integration. Mocking external dependencies is a good practice in unit testing, ensuring that we're testing the integration in isolation.
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js (2)
81-81: LGTM: New import for Gainsight_PX added correctly.The import statement for Gainsight_PX follows the established pattern in this file and is correctly implemented.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 81-81: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/integration_cname.js#L81
Added line #L81 was not covered by tests
166-166: LGTM: Gainsight_PX added to commonNames object.The Gainsight_PX integration has been correctly added to the
commonNamesobject, following the established pattern in this file.However, the static analysis tool indicates that this line is not covered by tests.
To ensure proper test coverage, please add or update tests for the Gainsight_PX integration. You can verify the test coverage by running the following command:
If no test files or test cases are found, consider adding appropriate tests to cover the Gainsight_PX integration.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Gainsight_PX added to commonNames object with existing test coverage.
The Gainsight_PX integration has been correctly added to the
commonNamesobject, and existing tests inbrowser.test.jsadequately cover this integration.No further action is required regarding test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for Gainsight_PX integration # Test: Search for test files related to Gainsight_PX echo "Searching for Gainsight_PX test files:" fd --type file --extension test.js Gainsight_PX # Test: Check if Gainsight_PX is included in any existing test cases echo "Checking for Gainsight_PX in existing test cases:" rg --type js 'Gainsight_PX' --glob '*.test.js'Length of output: 1374
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts (1)
293-296: LGTM! New export statement for Gainsight PX integration added correctly.The export statement for Gainsight PX follows the established pattern and naming conventions used for other integrations in this file. This addition aligns with the PR objective of introducing a new destination integration for Gainsight PX.
However, it's important to ensure that this new integration is properly tested. Please add a test file for the Gainsight PX constants. You can create a new test file at:
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/__tests__/constants.test.tsHere's a script to verify the existence of the test file:
This will help ensure comprehensive test coverage for the new integration.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage for Gainsight PX integration exists.
The necessary test file
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/__tests__/constants.test.tshas been created, ensuring proper test coverage for the new export statement.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test files related to Gainsight PX integration # Search for test files related to Gainsight PX echo "Searching for Gainsight PX test files:" fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts Gainsight_PX # If no files are found, suggest creating a test file if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "No test files found for Gainsight PX integration." echo "Consider creating a test file at: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/__tests__/constants.test.ts" fiLength of output: 144
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 293-295: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts#L293-L295
Added lines #L293 - L295 were not covered by tests
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/nativeSdkLoader.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/nativeSdkLoader.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/analytics-js-integrations/src/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js (3)
40-66: LGTM: 'init' method tests are comprehensive.The tests for the
initmethod cover the main scenarios, including successful initialization and the case when the user ID is not present. The expectations are clear and verify the correct behavior.Consider adding a test case for when
getGroupIdreturns null to ensure the method handles missing group data correctly.
95-148: LGTM: 'identify' method tests are thorough.The tests for the
identifymethod cover various scenarios, including cases with and without user ID, and an identify call with ID only. The expectations are clear and verify the correct behavior.Consider adding a test case for when the
context.traitsobject is empty or undefined to ensure the method handles these cases gracefully.
190-238: LGTM: 'track' method tests are well-structured.The tests for the
trackmethod cover important scenarios, including cases with and without event name, and a case with empty properties. The expectations are clear and verify the intended behavior.Consider adding a test case for when the
propertiesobject contains nested objects or arrays to ensure the method handles complex property structures correctly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/analytics-js-integrations/tests/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js (2)
Learnt from: saikumarrs PR: rudderlabs/rudder-sdk-js#1823 File: packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Amplitude/browser.test.js:193-194 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:52:59.819Z Learning: In the Amplitude integration tests (`browser.test.js`), the tests no longer rely on `appVersion`, so including `appVersion` in the mocked navigator object is unnecessary.Learnt from: saikumarrs PR: rudderlabs/rudder-sdk-js#1823 File: packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Amplitude/browser.test.js:193-194 Timestamp: 2024-10-07T05:43:26.038Z Learning: In the Amplitude integration tests (`browser.test.js`), the tests no longer rely on `appVersion`, so including `appVersion` in the mocked navigator object is unnecessary.
🪛 Biome
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js
[error] 75-75: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 90-90: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/analytics-js-integrations/__tests__/integrations/Gainsight_PX/browser.test.js (4)
1-38: LGTM: Imports and setup are well-structured.The import statements, mocking of external dependencies, and test setup in the
beforeEachblock are well-organized and follow best practices for unit testing.
150-188: LGTM: 'group' method tests are comprehensive.The tests for the
groupmethod cover important scenarios, including cases with bothgroupIdandanonymousId. The fallback toanonymousIdwhengroupIdis not present is correctly tested. The expectations are clear and verify the intended behavior.
1-239: Overall, excellent test coverage for the Gainsight_PX integration.The test suite for the Gainsight_PX integration is comprehensive, well-structured, and follows best practices for unit testing. It covers all major methods (
init,isLoaded,isReady,identify,group, andtrack) with various scenarios, ensuring robust functionality.Key strengths:
- Proper setup and teardown of test environment
- Comprehensive coverage of different scenarios for each method
- Clear and specific expectations
- Good use of mocking for external dependencies
Minor suggestions for improvement have been made in previous comments, but these are enhancements to an already solid test suite.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 75-75: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 90-90: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
68-93: LGTM: 'isLoaded' and 'isReady' methods are well-tested.The tests for
isLoadedandisReadymethods cover the main scenarios and verify the correct behavior. The use of thedeleteoperator in tests (lines 75 and 90) is acceptable in this context, as it's used to simulate the absence of thewindow.aptrinsicobject for testing purposes.Regarding the static analysis hints about the
deleteoperator:This will help us ensure that the
deleteoperator is only used in test files and not in production code.✅ Verification successful
Verified: Usage of the
deleteoperator is confined to test files.The
delete window.aptrinsicstatement is only present inbrowser.test.js, ensuring that thedeleteoperator is not used in production code. This confirms that its usage within the tests is appropriate and does not pose any issues for the production environment.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if the delete operator is used elsewhere in the codebase rg --type js 'delete\s+window\.aptrinsic' .Length of output: 285
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 75-75: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 90-90: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destDisplayNamesToFileNamesMap.ts (1)
248-248: LGTM: Mapping addition is correct and maintains alphabetical order.The new entry
[Gainsight_PXDisplayName]: Gainsight_PXDirectoryNameis correctly added to thedestDisplayNamesToFileNamesMapobject and maintains the alphabetical order of integrations.For consistency with other entries, consider adding a trailing comma to this line:
- [Gainsight_PXDisplayName]: Gainsight_PXDirectoryName, + [Gainsight_PXDisplayName]: Gainsight_PXDirectoryName,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destDisplayNamesToFileNamesMap.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destDisplayNamesToFileNamesMap.ts (2)
161-162: LGTM: Import additions are consistent and follow the established pattern.The new imports for
Gainsight_PXDisplayNameandGainsight_PXDirectoryNameare correctly added and follow the naming convention used for other integrations in this file.
Line range hint
1-252: Overall, the changes for Gainsight PX integration are well-implemented.The additions to this file are consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. They correctly integrate the new Gainsight PX destination into the mapping system used by the SDK. These changes align well with the PR objectives of introducing a new destination integration for Gainsight PX.
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/destinationNames.ts (1)
294-296: LGTM! New export statement for Gainsight PX integration added correctly.The export statement for Gainsight PX follows the established pattern and naming conventions used for other integrations in this file. This addition aligns with the PR objective of introducing a new destination integration for Gainsight PX.
However, as mentioned in a previous review comment, there might be missing test coverage for this new integration.
To address this, please ensure that appropriate tests are added to cover the new Gainsight PX integration. You can verify the test coverage by running the following command:
If no test files are found, please create appropriate tests to ensure coverage of the new Gainsight PX integration.
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage for Gainsight PX integration is confirmed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test files related to Gainsight PX integration # Search for test files related to Gainsight PX echo "Searching for Gainsight PX test files:" fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts Gainsight_PX # If no files are found, suggest creating a test file if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "No test files found for Gainsight PX integration." echo "Consider creating a test file at: packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/Gainsight_PX/__tests__/constants.test.ts" fiLength of output: 144
packages/analytics-js-common/src/constants/integrations/client_server_name.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/analytics-js/.size-limit.mjs (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Overall assessment of size limit increasesThe changes in this file reflect small increases (0.5 - 1 KiB) in size limits for various build outputs, likely due to the addition of the Gainsight PX integration.
While these increases are relatively small, consider the following recommendations:
- Regularly review and optimize the codebase to prevent cumulative size increases over time.
- Implement a process for evaluating the impact of new integrations on bundle size before merging.
- Consider setting up automated alerts or checks for significant bundle size increases in your CI/CD pipeline.
- Document the reasons for size limit increases in the PR description or commit messages for future reference.
These practices will help maintain a balance between adding new features and keeping the bundle size optimized.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/analytics-js/.size-limit.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/analytics-js/.size-limit.mjs (3)
10-10: Verify the necessity of the size limit increase.The size limit for 'Core - Legacy - NPM (ESM)' has been increased by 1 KiB. While this is likely due to the addition of the Gainsight PX integration, please verify if this increase is absolutely necessary.
Consider the following:
- Are there any unused imports or dead code that can be removed?
- Can any shared functionality be refactored to reduce duplication?
- Have you considered using tree-shaking to minimize the bundle size?
If the increase is unavoidable, please provide a brief explanation in the PR description.
16-16: Ensure consistent optimization for ESM and CJS versions.The size limit increase for 'Core - Legacy - NPM (CJS)' matches the increase for the ESM version. This consistency is good to see.
Please ensure that any optimizations applied to the ESM version are also applied to the CJS version to maintain this consistency.
Line range hint
58-58: Investigate size difference between bundled and non-bundled versions.The size limit for 'Core (Bundled) - Legacy - NPM (CJS)' has increased by 0.5 KiB, which is less than the 1 KiB increase seen in the non-bundled versions.
Could you please explain:
- Why is the size increase smaller for the bundled version?
- Are there any optimizations applied during bundling that could be leveraged in the non-bundled versions?
- Is it possible to apply similar optimizations to reduce the size increase in the non-bundled versions?
shrouti1507
dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and sanpj2292
via
c6c8e3f
|
feat: gainsight PX destination
feat: Gainsight PX destination PR Feedback - changed name to use existing name
feat: gainsight PX destination PR feedback - Switched to use integration options instead of extra config object. Cleaned up identify
feat: gainsight PX destination PR feedback - Use integration config
feat: gainsight PX destination fixed typo on us2 datacenter URL
PR Description
Please include a summary of the change along with the relevant motivation and context.
Linear task (optional)
Linear task link
Cross Browser Tests
Please confirm you have tested for the following browsers:
Sanity Suite
Security
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests