-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: event queue issues #1951
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix: event queue issues #1951
Conversation
Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/analytics-js-plugins/src/utilities/retryQueue/RetryQueue.ts (2)
544-545
: Enhance error handling with more contextThe error handling improvement is good, but we could provide more context in the error log to help with debugging.
Consider adding more context to the error log:
- el.done(); - this.logger?.error(RETRY_QUEUE_PROCESS_ERROR(RETRY_QUEUE), err); + el.done(); + this.logger?.error( + RETRY_QUEUE_PROCESS_ERROR(RETRY_QUEUE), + { + error: err, + item: el.item, + attemptNumber: el.attemptNumber, + maxAttempts: this.maxAttempts + } + );
544-545
: Consider adding metrics for dropped itemsIt would be valuable to track how many items are being dropped due to processing failures.
Consider adding metrics tracking:
el.done(); + // Track dropped items metric + this.metrics?.increment('retry_queue.dropped_items', 1, { + reason: 'process_error', + attempt: el.attemptNumber.toString() + }); this.logger?.error(RETRY_QUEUE_PROCESS_ERROR(RETRY_QUEUE), err);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
.github/workflows/deploy-beta.yml
is excluded by!**/*.yml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/analytics-js-plugins/src/utilities/retryQueue/RetryQueue.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/analytics-js-plugins/src/utilities/retryQueue/RetryQueue.ts (1)
544-545
: Verify retry behavior for dropped items
The change to call el.done()
means items that fail processing will be dropped from the in-progress queue. Let's verify this doesn't affect items that should be retried.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now verify the retry behavior. The code shows:
- The
shouldRetry
function is properly called before processing items to determine if they should be retried - The retry logic is tested extensively as seen in the test files
- When
el.done()
is called in the error catch block, it's only after determining the item cannot be processed at all (due to an exception), not due to a retriable failure - The normal retry path is handled by the
processQueueCb
which receives thewillBeRetried
flag to properly handle retryable failures
The change to call el.done()
only drops items that throw exceptions during processing, not items that fail with retriable errors. The retry behavior is preserved.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any retry-related issues or patterns in the codebase
# Look for retry-related patterns and their handling
ast-grep --pattern 'shouldRetry($_,$_)'
# Look for other error handling patterns in queue processing
rg -A 5 'processQueueCb|el\.done\(\)'
Length of output: 37974
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1951 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 58.29% 58.21% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 485 485
Lines 16613 16646 +33
Branches 3333 3368 +35
==========================================
+ Hits 9685 9691 +6
+ Misses 5713 5699 -14
- Partials 1215 1256 +41 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
size-limit report 📦
|
@coderabbitai pause |
✅ Actions performedReviews paused. |
64ce326
to
781c216
Compare
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions |
PR Description
Please include a summary of the change along with the relevant motivation and context.
Linear task (optional)
Linear task link
Cross Browser Tests
Please confirm you have tested for the following browsers:
Sanity Suite
Security
Summary by CodeRabbit
These enhancements contribute to more reliable data processing and prevent stale data issues.