feat: Improve CI #431
feat: Improve CI #431
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications across several files, primarily focusing on the handling of API keys in a Continuous Integration (CI) environment. In Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@leehuwuj has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
questions/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
12-19: Address type safety concerns in the pro questions path.The current implementation has two issues that should be addressed:
- The unsafe type casting
args as unknown as QuestionResultscould hide potential type mismatches- There's a TODO comment indicating needed refactoring
Would you like help with:
- Implementing proper return type handling for
askProQuestions?- Creating a GitHub issue to track the refactoring work?
The refactoring should ensure type safety by having
askProQuestionsreturn a properQuestionResultsobject instead of relying on type casting.helpers/providers/openai.ts (1)
Line range hint
15-24: Document CI behavior in function JSDocConsider adding documentation about how the function behaves differently in CI environments. This will help other developers understand the expected behavior.
Add JSDoc comments like this:
+/** + * Prompts for OpenAI configuration unless running in CI environment. + * In CI, relies entirely on environment variables for API keys. + * @param {Object} params Configuration parameters + * @param {string} [params.openAiKey] Optional API key + * @param {boolean} [params.askModels] Whether to prompt for model selection + * @returns {Promise<ModelConfigParams>} Resolved configuration + */ export async function askOpenAIQuestions({ openAiKey, askModels, }: ModelConfigQuestionsParams): Promise<ModelConfigParams> {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
e2e/utils.ts(0 hunks)helpers/providers/openai.ts(2 hunks)questions/index.ts(1 hunks)questions/questions.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- e2e/utils.ts
🔇 Additional comments (6)
questions/index.ts (1)
7-7: Add JSDoc documentation for the exported isCI constant.
Since this is an exported constant used across multiple files for CI detection, it would be valuable to document its purpose and implications.
Add documentation like:
+/**
+ * Indicates whether the code is running in a CI environment.
+ * This includes both standard CI platforms (detected via ci-info)
+ * and Playwright test runs.
+ */
export const isCI = ciInfo.isCI || process.env.PLAYWRIGHT_TEST === "1";Let's verify where this constant is being used:
✅ Verification successful
Add JSDoc documentation for the exported isCI constant
The suggested documentation would be valuable as the isCI constant is used in a clear and appropriate way - to skip interactive prompts in CI environments. The current usage in helpers/providers/openai.ts shows it's being used to determine whether to prompt for an API key interactively, which aligns perfectly with both CI detection methods (standard CI platforms and Playwright test runs).
+/**
+ * Indicates whether the code is running in a CI environment.
+ * This includes both standard CI platforms (detected via ci-info)
+ * and Playwright test runs.
+ */
export const isCI = ciInfo.isCI || process.env.PLAYWRIGHT_TEST === "1";🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all usages of isCI to ensure the combined detection logic is appropriate
# for all use cases
echo "Searching for isCI imports and usages:"
rg -l "import.*\{.*isCI.*\}.*from.*['\"].*questions.*['\"]"
Length of output: 180
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how isCI is used in the openai.ts file
rg "isCI" helpers/providers/openai.ts -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 329
helpers/providers/openai.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM: Clean import addition
The import of isCI is properly placed and aligns with the PR's objective to improve CI handling.
34-34: Verify API key handling in CI environment
While skipping the prompt in CI is logical, we should ensure proper error handling when API keys are missing in CI environments.
Let's verify the error handling paths:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the error handling in the OpenAI provider.
API key handling in CI environment is properly implemented
The code has appropriate error handling for missing API keys:
- In CI, it skips the interactive prompt but still requires the API key through environment variables
- The
getAvailableModelChoicesfunction explicitly throws an error if no API key is provided: "need OpenAI key to retrieve model choices" - The validation logic ensures API key is present either through user input or environment variable before proceeding
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper error handling when API keys are missing
# Look for error handling related to missing API keys in CI context
# Search for OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable usage
rg "OPENAI_API_KEY" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for error handling patterns around API key validation
ast-grep --pattern 'if (!$apiKey) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 7738
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check error handling in OpenAI provider
rg -A 10 "if \(!config\.apiKey" helpers/providers/openai.ts
# Check getAvailableModelChoices implementation
rg -A 15 "getAvailableModelChoices" helpers/providers/openai.ts
# Look for any throw statements related to API keys
rg "throw.*api.*key" -i
Length of output: 1700
questions/questions.ts (3)
3-3: LGTM!
The import statement is correctly placed and follows TypeScript conventions.
Line range hint 390-402: LGTM! Good handling of CI environment.
The condition correctly prevents prompting for API key in CI environment while maintaining the interactive prompt for development.
Line range hint 390-402: Verify API key availability in CI environment.
In CI environment, if both program.llamaCloudKey and process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY are not set, the code continues without a key which could cause issues downstream. Consider adding validation to ensure API key is available when required in CI.
Add validation before the prompt:
if (isUsingLlamaCloud || program.useLlamaParse) {
+ // Ensure API key is available in CI
+ if (isCI && !program.llamaCloudKey && !process.env.LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY) {
+ throw new Error(
+ 'LlamaCloud API key is required in CI environment. Please set LLAMA_CLOUD_API_KEY environment variable.'
+ );
+ }
if (!program.llamaCloudKey && !isCI) {
// if already set, don't ask again
// Ask for LlamaCloud API key
leehuwuj
force-pushed
the
lee/improve-ci
branch
from
27f1834
to
745ef77
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Improvements