Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Update code due to change in unstructured #14606

Conversation

tibor-reiss
Copy link
Contributor

@tibor-reiss tibor-reiss commented Jul 6, 2024

Description

There were some breaking changes introduced lately in unstructured, namely:

Fixes #14301

New Package?

Did I fill in the tool.llamahub section in the pyproject.toml and provide a detailed README.md for my new integration or package?

  • Yes
  • No

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Added new unit/integration tests
  • Added new notebook (that tests end-to-end)
  • I stared at the code and made sure it makes sense
  • Ran test_unstructured.py + first part of tesla_10q_table.ipynb

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran make format; make lint to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 6, 2024
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ def extract_elements(
elements = partition_html(text=text, **self.partitioning_parameters)
output_els = []
for idx, element in enumerate(elements):
if "unstructured.documents.html.HTMLTable" in str(type(element)):
if "unstructured.documents.elements.Table" in str(type(element)):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am reminded how hacky this is haha -- thank you!

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 8, 2024
@logan-markewich logan-markewich merged commit 2f555f1 into run-llama:main Jul 8, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: UnstructuredElementNodeParser can't parse Table Element in html
2 participants