Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edition 2024: don't special-case diverging blocks as much #123590

Closed
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,19 +46,18 @@ use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{self, ObligationCauseCode, SelectionContext}
use std::iter;
use std::mem;

#[derive(Clone, Copy, Default)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
pub enum DivergingBlockBehavior {
/// This is the current stable behavior:
/// This is edition <= 2021 behavior:
///
/// ```rust
/// {
/// return;
/// } // block has type = !, even though we are supposedly dropping it with `;`
/// ```
#[default]
Never,

/// Alternative behavior:
/// This is edition >= 2024 behavior:
///
/// ```ignore (very-unstable-new-attribute)
/// #![rustc_never_type_options(diverging_block_default = "unit")]
Expand Down
11 changes: 10 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -441,7 +441,16 @@ fn parse_never_type_options_attr(
if tcx.features().never_type_fallback { FallbackToNiko } else { FallbackToUnit }
});

let block = block.unwrap_or_default();
let block = block.unwrap_or_else(|| default_diverging_block_behavior(tcx));

(fallback, block)
}

/// Returns the edition-based default diverging block behavior
fn default_diverging_block_behavior(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>) -> DivergingBlockBehavior {
if tcx.sess.edition().at_least_rust_2024() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this right? Couldn't the block come from an older-edition macro?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not right, good point. I was thinking so much about the never type fallback change (which has to be crate-global) that I forgot we can have more local things 🙈

Will change it to check the edition per-block.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we put this behind a feature gate? Especially if it's for experimenting. We can make a "stabilization PR" that removes the need for the gate once it's settled.

return DivergingBlockBehavior::Unit;
}

DivergingBlockBehavior::Never
}
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/suggest.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -714,6 +714,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
let last_expr_ty = self.typeck_results.as_ref()?.expr_ty_opt(last_expr)?;
let needs_box = match (last_expr_ty.kind(), expected_ty.kind()) {
_ if last_expr_ty.references_error() => return None,
(ty::Never, _) => StatementAsExpression::CorrectType,
_ if self.same_type_modulo_infer(last_expr_ty, expected_ty) => {
StatementAsExpression::CorrectType
}
Expand Down
30 changes: 30 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/editions/diverging-block.e2024.fixed
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
//@ revisions: e2021 e2024
//
//@[e2021] edition: 2021
//@[e2024] edition: 2024
//@[e2024] compile-flags: -Zunstable-options
//
//@[e2021] check-pass
//@[e2024] check-fail
//
//@[e2024] run-rustfix


fn main() {
// a diverging block, with no tail expression.
//
// edition <= 2021: the block has type `!`, which then can be coerced.
// edition >= 2024: the block has type `()`, as with any block with no tail.
let _: u32 = { //[e2024]~ error: mismatched types
return
};
}

fn _f() {
// Same as the above, but with an if
if true {
return
} else {
0_u32 //[e2024]~ error: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
};
}
28 changes: 28 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/editions/diverging-block.e2024.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/diverging-block.rs:18:18
|
LL | let _: u32 = {
| __________________^
LL | | return;
| | - help: remove this semicolon to return this value
LL | | };
| |_____^ expected `u32`, found `()`

error[E0308]: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
--> $DIR/diverging-block.rs:28:9
|
LL | / if true {
LL | | return;
| | -------
| | | |
| | | help: consider removing this semicolon
| | expected because of this
LL | | } else {
LL | | 0_u32
| | ^^^^^ expected `()`, found `u32`
LL | | };
| |_____- `if` and `else` have incompatible types

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
30 changes: 30 additions & 0 deletions tests/ui/editions/diverging-block.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
//@ revisions: e2021 e2024
//
//@[e2021] edition: 2021
//@[e2024] edition: 2024
//@[e2024] compile-flags: -Zunstable-options
//
//@[e2021] check-pass
//@[e2024] check-fail
//
//@[e2024] run-rustfix


fn main() {
// a diverging block, with no tail expression.
//
// edition <= 2021: the block has type `!`, which then can be coerced.
// edition >= 2024: the block has type `()`, as with any block with no tail.
let _: u32 = { //[e2024]~ error: mismatched types
return;
};
}

fn _f() {
// Same as the above, but with an if
if true {
return;
} else {
0_u32 //[e2024]~ error: `if` and `else` have incompatible types
};
}
Loading