-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Don't rerun goals if none of their vars have changed #141500
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ where | |
{ | ||
/// Canonicalizes the goal remembering the original values | ||
/// for each bound variable. | ||
pub(super) fn canonicalize_goal<T: TypeFoldable<I>>( | ||
pub(super) fn canonicalize_goal( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. didnt need to be this generic :> |
||
&self, | ||
goal: Goal<I, T>, | ||
) -> (Vec<I::GenericArg>, CanonicalInput<I, T>) { | ||
goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>, | ||
) -> (Vec<I::GenericArg>, CanonicalInput<I, I::Predicate>) { | ||
// We only care about one entry per `OpaqueTypeKey` here, | ||
// so we only canonicalize the lookup table and ignore | ||
// duplicate entries. | ||
|
@@ -130,7 +130,12 @@ where | |
if goals.is_empty() { | ||
assert!(matches!(goals_certainty, Certainty::Yes)); | ||
} | ||
(Certainty::Yes, NestedNormalizationGoals(goals)) | ||
( | ||
Certainty::Yes, | ||
NestedNormalizationGoals( | ||
goals.into_iter().map(|(s, g, _)| (s, g)).collect(), | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we could actually canonicalize these keys i think, which may prevent a rerun in the parent query |
||
), | ||
) | ||
} | ||
_ => { | ||
let certainty = shallow_certainty.and(goals_certainty); | ||
|
@@ -272,7 +277,7 @@ where | |
pub(super) fn instantiate_and_apply_query_response( | ||
&mut self, | ||
param_env: I::ParamEnv, | ||
original_values: Vec<I::GenericArg>, | ||
original_values: &[I::GenericArg], | ||
response: CanonicalResponse<I>, | ||
) -> (NestedNormalizationGoals<I>, Certainty) { | ||
let instantiation = Self::compute_query_response_instantiation_values( | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -22,8 +22,9 @@ use crate::delegate::SolverDelegate; | |
use crate::solve::inspect::{self, ProofTreeBuilder}; | ||
use crate::solve::search_graph::SearchGraph; | ||
use crate::solve::{ | ||
CanonicalInput, Certainty, FIXPOINT_STEP_LIMIT, Goal, GoalEvaluationKind, GoalSource, | ||
HasChanged, NestedNormalizationGoals, NoSolution, QueryInput, QueryResult, | ||
CanonicalInput, Certainty, FIXPOINT_STEP_LIMIT, Goal, GoalEvaluation, GoalEvaluationKind, | ||
GoalSource, GoalStalledOn, HasChanged, NestedNormalizationGoals, NoSolution, QueryInput, | ||
QueryResult, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
pub(super) mod canonical; | ||
|
@@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ where | |
|
||
pub(super) search_graph: &'a mut SearchGraph<D>, | ||
|
||
nested_goals: Vec<(GoalSource, Goal<I, I::Predicate>)>, | ||
nested_goals: Vec<(GoalSource, Goal<I, I::Predicate>, Option<GoalStalledOn<I>>)>, | ||
|
||
pub(super) origin_span: I::Span, | ||
|
||
|
@@ -147,8 +148,9 @@ pub trait SolverDelegateEvalExt: SolverDelegate { | |
goal: Goal<Self::Interner, <Self::Interner as Interner>::Predicate>, | ||
generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree, | ||
span: <Self::Interner as Interner>::Span, | ||
stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<Self::Interner>>, | ||
) -> ( | ||
Result<(HasChanged, Certainty), NoSolution>, | ||
Result<GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>, NoSolution>, | ||
lcnr marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>>, | ||
); | ||
|
||
|
@@ -171,8 +173,12 @@ pub trait SolverDelegateEvalExt: SolverDelegate { | |
&self, | ||
goal: Goal<Self::Interner, <Self::Interner as Interner>::Predicate>, | ||
generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree, | ||
stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<Self::Interner>>, | ||
) -> ( | ||
Result<(NestedNormalizationGoals<Self::Interner>, HasChanged, Certainty), NoSolution>, | ||
Result< | ||
(NestedNormalizationGoals<Self::Interner>, GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>), | ||
NoSolution, | ||
>, | ||
Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>>, | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -188,9 +194,10 @@ where | |
goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>, | ||
generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree, | ||
span: I::Span, | ||
) -> (Result<(HasChanged, Certainty), NoSolution>, Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<I>>) { | ||
stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<I>>, | ||
) -> (Result<GoalEvaluation<I>, NoSolution>, Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<I>>) { | ||
EvalCtxt::enter_root(self, self.cx().recursion_limit(), generate_proof_tree, span, |ecx| { | ||
ecx.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal) | ||
ecx.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal, stalled_on) | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -201,7 +208,7 @@ where | |
) -> bool { | ||
self.probe(|| { | ||
EvalCtxt::enter_root(self, root_depth, GenerateProofTree::No, I::Span::dummy(), |ecx| { | ||
ecx.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal) | ||
ecx.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal, None) | ||
}) | ||
.0 | ||
}) | ||
|
@@ -213,16 +220,19 @@ where | |
&self, | ||
goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>, | ||
generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree, | ||
stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<I>>, | ||
) -> ( | ||
Result<(NestedNormalizationGoals<I>, HasChanged, Certainty), NoSolution>, | ||
Result<(NestedNormalizationGoals<I>, GoalEvaluation<I>), NoSolution>, | ||
Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<I>>, | ||
) { | ||
EvalCtxt::enter_root( | ||
self, | ||
self.cx().recursion_limit(), | ||
generate_proof_tree, | ||
I::Span::dummy(), | ||
|ecx| ecx.evaluate_goal_raw(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal), | ||
|ecx| { | ||
ecx.evaluate_goal_raw(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal, stalled_on) | ||
}, | ||
) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -447,11 +457,12 @@ where | |
goal_evaluation_kind: GoalEvaluationKind, | ||
source: GoalSource, | ||
goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>, | ||
) -> Result<(HasChanged, Certainty), NoSolution> { | ||
let (normalization_nested_goals, has_changed, certainty) = | ||
self.evaluate_goal_raw(goal_evaluation_kind, source, goal)?; | ||
stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<I>>, | ||
) -> Result<GoalEvaluation<I>, NoSolution> { | ||
let (normalization_nested_goals, goal_evaluation) = | ||
self.evaluate_goal_raw(goal_evaluation_kind, source, goal, stalled_on)?; | ||
assert!(normalization_nested_goals.is_empty()); | ||
Ok((has_changed, certainty)) | ||
Ok(goal_evaluation) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Recursively evaluates `goal`, returning the nested goals in case | ||
|
@@ -466,7 +477,29 @@ where | |
goal_evaluation_kind: GoalEvaluationKind, | ||
source: GoalSource, | ||
goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>, | ||
) -> Result<(NestedNormalizationGoals<I>, HasChanged, Certainty), NoSolution> { | ||
stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<I>>, | ||
) -> Result<(NestedNormalizationGoals<I>, GoalEvaluation<I>), NoSolution> { | ||
// If we have run this goal before, and it was stalled, check that any of the goal's | ||
// args have changed. Otherwise, we don't need to re-run the goal because it'll remain | ||
// stalled, since it'll canonicalize the same way and evaluation is pure. | ||
if let Some(stalled_on) = stalled_on { | ||
if !stalled_on.stalled_vars.iter().any(|value| self.delegate.is_changed_arg(*value)) | ||
&& !self | ||
.delegate | ||
.opaque_types_storage_num_entries() | ||
.needs_reevaluation(stalled_on.num_opaques) | ||
{ | ||
return Ok(( | ||
NestedNormalizationGoals::empty(), | ||
GoalEvaluation { | ||
certainty: Certainty::Maybe(stalled_on.stalled_cause), | ||
has_changed: HasChanged::No, | ||
stalled_on: Some(stalled_on), | ||
}, | ||
)); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
let (orig_values, canonical_goal) = self.canonicalize_goal(goal); | ||
let mut goal_evaluation = | ||
self.inspect.new_goal_evaluation(goal, &orig_values, goal_evaluation_kind); | ||
|
@@ -489,7 +522,7 @@ where | |
if !has_only_region_constraints(response) { HasChanged::Yes } else { HasChanged::No }; | ||
|
||
let (normalization_nested_goals, certainty) = | ||
self.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(goal.param_env, orig_values, response); | ||
self.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(goal.param_env, &orig_values, response); | ||
self.inspect.goal_evaluation(goal_evaluation); | ||
|
||
// FIXME: We previously had an assert here that checked that recomputing | ||
|
@@ -502,7 +535,42 @@ where | |
// Once we have decided on how to handle trait-system-refactor-initiative#75, | ||
// we should re-add an assert here. | ||
|
||
Ok((normalization_nested_goals, has_changed, certainty)) | ||
let stalled_on = match certainty { | ||
Certainty::Yes => None, | ||
Certainty::Maybe(stalled_cause) => match has_changed { | ||
// FIXME: We could recompute a *new* set of stalled variables by walking | ||
// through the orig values, resolving, and computing the root vars of anything | ||
// that is not resolved. Only when *these* have changed is it meaningful | ||
// to recompute this goal. | ||
HasChanged::Yes => None, | ||
HasChanged::No => { | ||
// Remove the unconstrained RHS arg, which is expected to have changed. | ||
let mut stalled_vars = orig_values; | ||
if let Some(normalizes_to) = goal.predicate.as_normalizes_to() { | ||
let normalizes_to = normalizes_to.skip_binder(); | ||
let rhs_arg: I::GenericArg = normalizes_to.term.into(); | ||
let idx = stalled_vars | ||
.iter() | ||
.rposition(|arg| *arg == rhs_arg) | ||
.expect("expected unconstrained arg"); | ||
stalled_vars.swap_remove(idx); | ||
} | ||
|
||
Some(GoalStalledOn { | ||
num_opaques: canonical_goal | ||
.canonical | ||
.value | ||
.predefined_opaques_in_body | ||
.opaque_types | ||
.len(), | ||
stalled_vars, | ||
stalled_cause, | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
Ok((normalization_nested_goals, GoalEvaluation { certainty, has_changed, stalled_on })) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn compute_goal(&mut self, goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>) -> QueryResult<I> { | ||
|
@@ -602,7 +670,7 @@ where | |
let cx = self.cx(); | ||
// If this loop did not result in any progress, what's our final certainty. | ||
let mut unchanged_certainty = Some(Certainty::Yes); | ||
for (source, goal) in mem::take(&mut self.nested_goals) { | ||
for (source, goal, stalled_on) in mem::take(&mut self.nested_goals) { | ||
if let Some(has_changed) = self.delegate.compute_goal_fast_path(goal, self.origin_span) | ||
{ | ||
if matches!(has_changed, HasChanged::Yes) { | ||
|
@@ -630,11 +698,18 @@ where | |
let unconstrained_goal = | ||
goal.with(cx, ty::NormalizesTo { alias: pred.alias, term: unconstrained_rhs }); | ||
|
||
let (NestedNormalizationGoals(nested_goals), _, certainty) = | ||
self.evaluate_goal_raw(GoalEvaluationKind::Nested, source, unconstrained_goal)?; | ||
let ( | ||
NestedNormalizationGoals(nested_goals), | ||
GoalEvaluation { certainty, stalled_on, has_changed: _ }, | ||
) = self.evaluate_goal_raw( | ||
GoalEvaluationKind::Nested, | ||
source, | ||
unconstrained_goal, | ||
stalled_on, | ||
)?; | ||
// Add the nested goals from normalization to our own nested goals. | ||
trace!(?nested_goals); | ||
self.nested_goals.extend(nested_goals); | ||
self.nested_goals.extend(nested_goals.into_iter().map(|(s, g)| (s, g, None))); | ||
|
||
// Finally, equate the goal's RHS with the unconstrained var. | ||
// | ||
|
@@ -660,6 +735,8 @@ where | |
// looking at the "has changed" return from evaluate_goal, | ||
// because we expect the `unconstrained_rhs` part of the predicate | ||
// to have changed -- that means we actually normalized successfully! | ||
// FIXME: Do we need to eagerly resolve here? Or should we check | ||
// if the cache key has any changed vars? | ||
let with_resolved_vars = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(goal); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this resolve call feels strange -- we should probably be checking if any of the vars changed at all? |
||
if pred.alias != goal.predicate.as_normalizes_to().unwrap().skip_binder().alias { | ||
unchanged_certainty = None; | ||
|
@@ -668,21 +745,21 @@ where | |
match certainty { | ||
Certainty::Yes => {} | ||
Certainty::Maybe(_) => { | ||
self.nested_goals.push((source, with_resolved_vars)); | ||
self.nested_goals.push((source, with_resolved_vars, stalled_on)); | ||
unchanged_certainty = unchanged_certainty.map(|c| c.and(certainty)); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
let (has_changed, certainty) = | ||
self.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Nested, source, goal)?; | ||
let GoalEvaluation { certainty, has_changed, stalled_on } = | ||
self.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Nested, source, goal, stalled_on)?; | ||
if has_changed == HasChanged::Yes { | ||
unchanged_certainty = None; | ||
} | ||
|
||
match certainty { | ||
Certainty::Yes => {} | ||
Certainty::Maybe(_) => { | ||
self.nested_goals.push((source, goal)); | ||
self.nested_goals.push((source, goal, stalled_on)); | ||
unchanged_certainty = unchanged_certainty.map(|c| c.and(certainty)); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
@@ -706,7 +783,7 @@ where | |
goal.predicate = | ||
goal.predicate.fold_with(&mut ReplaceAliasWithInfer::new(self, source, goal.param_env)); | ||
self.inspect.add_goal(self.delegate, self.max_input_universe, source, goal); | ||
self.nested_goals.push((source, goal)); | ||
self.nested_goals.push((source, goal, None)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, goals))] | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ew but also i dont think we need a better API For now.