Skip to content

aarch64: Make outline-atomics a known target feature #144761

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 commented Aug 1, 2025

This is a feature used by LLVM that is enabled for our aarch64-linux targets, which we would like to configure on in std. Thus, mark outline-atomics a known feature. It is left unstable for now.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 1, 2025

r? @davidtwco

rustbot has assigned @davidtwco.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 1, 2025
@tgross35 tgross35 force-pushed the cfg-outline-atomics branch from 90ec7ea to 7a8462f Compare August 1, 2025 01:02
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

This is a feature used by LLVM that is enabled for our `aarch64-linux`
targets, which we would like to configure on in `std`. Thus, mark
`outline-atomics` a known feature. It is left unstable for now.
@tgross35 tgross35 force-pushed the cfg-outline-atomics branch from 7a8462f to 24c770b Compare August 1, 2025 03:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants