Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
update for rustc_intrinsic_const_stable_indirect
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
RalfJung committed Nov 18, 2024
1 parent da53251 commit a8653b4
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 2 deletions.
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions src/stability.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ ipsum")]` has the same interface as the `unstable` attribute. It is used to mark
- If a `const fn` makes use of unstable language features or intrinsics.
(The compiler will tell you to add the attribute if you run into this.)
- If a `const fn` is `#[stable]` but not yet intended to be const-stable.
- To change the feature get that is required to call a const-unstable intrinsic.

Const-stability differs from regular stability in that it is *recursive*: a
`#[rustc_const_unstable(...)]` function cannot even be indirectly called from stable code. This is
Expand All @@ -79,10 +80,10 @@ compiler features); the only reason it is not const-stable yet are API concerns.
This should also be added to lang items for which const-calls are synthesized in the compiler, to
ensure those calls do not bypass recursive const stability rules.

## rustc_const_stable_intrinsic
## rustc_intrinsic_const_stable_indirect

On an intrinsic, this attribute marks the intrinsic as "ready to be used by public stable functions".
The `rustc_const_unstable` can be removed when this attribute is added.
If the intrinsic has a `rustc_const_unstable` attribute, it should be removed.
**Adding this attribute to an intrinsic requires t-lang and wg-const-eval approval!**

## rustc_default_body_unstable
Expand Down

0 comments on commit a8653b4

Please sign in to comment.