-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 299
intrinsic-test
: Adding x86 behavioural testing.
#1894
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
intrinsic-test
: Adding x86 behavioural testing.
#1894
Conversation
41db5a8
to
5fc0f3b
Compare
match str::parse::<u32>(etype_processed.as_str()) { | ||
Ok(value) => data.bit_len = Some(value), | ||
Err(_) => { | ||
data.bit_len = match data.kind() { | ||
TypeKind::Char(_) => Some(8), | ||
TypeKind::BFloat => Some(16), | ||
TypeKind::Int(_) => Some(32), | ||
TypeKind::Float => Some(32), | ||
_ => None, | ||
}; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why are only some type kinds covered here? Maybe this could be a method on TypeKind
?
Notes: 1. chunk_info has been moved to `common/mod.rs` since it will be needed for all architectures
9e28106
to
111cd5d
Compare
parameters/return value of an intrinsic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you should rebase on top of the upstream master branch instead of merging it in. That keeps the git history clean.
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu*) | ||
CPPFLAGS="${TEST_CPPFLAGS}" RUSTFLAGS="${HOST_RUSTFLAGS}" RUST_LOG=warn \ | ||
cargo run "${INTRINSIC_TEST}" "${PROFILE}" \ | ||
--bin intrinsic-test -- intrinsics_data/x86-intel.xml \ | ||
--runner "${TEST_RUNNER}" \ | ||
--cppcompiler "${TEST_CXX_COMPILER}" \ | ||
--target "${TARGET}" | ||
;; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we'll have to see how to do this exactly, but we want to split these out of the main CI job to speed it up
Context
This is a redo of PR #1814, since a lot of details have changed with PRs #1863, #1862, #1861, #1852.
r? @folkertdev
cc: @Amanieu