Refactor: unify confirmBatch screen

[clovisdasilvaneto]

What it solves

This PR is part of the unify confirmations screen refactor in the transactions flow (#4177).

How this PR fixes it

In this PR we're moving the BatchList from ConfirmBatch component to be inside the tx/confirmation-view/BatchTransactions component. Please noticed we still have logic inside the ConfirmBatch component because the SignOrExecuteForm/index depends on the SafeTx in order to get the transactionDetails, and the place where we create the SafeTx for the Batch screen is inside the ConfirmBatch component.

How to test it

1. Go to the top bar of the application and try to send a batch transaction
2. The confirm batch transaction screen should look the same as production app.

Screenshots

Checklist

• I've tested the branch on mobile 📱
• I've documented how it affects the analytics (if at all) 📊
• I've written a unit/e2e test for it (if applicable) 🧑‍💻

[github-actions]

Branch preview

✅ Deploy successful!

Website:
https://chore_unify_confirm_batch_screen--walletweb.review.5afe.dev/home?safe=eth:0xA77DE01e157f9f57C7c4A326eeE9C4874D0598b6

Storybook:
https://chore_unify_confirm_batch_screen--walletweb.review.5afe.dev/storybook/

[github-actions]

ESLint Summary View Full Report

Annotations are provided inline on the Files Changed tab. You can also see all annotations that were generated on the annotations page.

Type	Occurrences	Fixable
Errors	0	0
Warnings	1	0
Ignored	0	N/A

• Result: ✅ success

• Annotations: 1 total

  ---

[warning] react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

verifies the list of dependencies for Hooks like useEffect and similar

• src/components/tx/confirmation-views/index.tsx Line 54 - React Hook useMemo has a missing dependency: 'txFlow'. Either include it or remove the dependency array.

---

^{Report generated by eslint-plus-action}

[github-actions]

📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for safe-wallet-web

This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖

⚠️ Global Bundle Size Increased

Page	Size (compressed)
global	954.34 KB (🟡 +97 B)

Details

The global bundle is the javascript bundle that loads alongside every page. It is in its own category because its impact is much higher - an increase to its size means that every page on your website loads slower, and a decrease means every page loads faster.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

If you want further insight into what is behind the changes, give @next/bundle-analyzer a try!

Three Pages Changed Size

The following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:

Page	Size (compressed)	First Load
/balances	30.99 KB (-1 B)	985.32 KB
/home	60.21 KB (-4 B)	1014.55 KB
/swap	733 B (🟡 +1 B)	955.05 KB

Details

Only the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip.

First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If next/link is used, subsequent page loads would only need to download that page's bundle (the number in the "Size" column), since the global bundle has already been downloaded.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

Next to the size is how much the size has increased or decreased compared with the base branch of this PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this.

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟡	Statements	78.61% (+0.14% 🔼)	12211/15534
🔴	Branches	59.15% (+0.12% 🔼)	3158/5339
🟡	Functions	65.9% (+0.15% 🔼)	1929/2927
🟢	Lines	80.08% (+0.12% 🔼)	11012/13751

Show new covered files 🐣

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟢	... / index.tsx	100%	100%	100%	100%
🟢	... / BatchTxList.tsx	100%	100%	100%	100%
🟡	... / BatchTxItem.tsx	79.17%	71.43%	50%	78.26%
🟢	... / utils.ts	100%	100%	100%	100%
🟢	... / mockData.ts	100%	100%	100%	100%

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟢	... / index.tsx	92.31% (-3.15% 🔻)	52.38% (-6.71% 🔻)	100%	100%
🟢	... / useTxPendingStatuses.ts	83.64% (-0.91% 🔻)	68.33% (-1.67% 🔻)	75%	92.63% (-1.05% 🔻)

Test suite run success

1494 tests passing in 208 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 86f3947

[katspaugh]

Looks good but there's one lint issue