Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

get rid of sage_eval in Mestre call of magma #38652

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

avoid one use of sage_eval by better communication with magma

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit c90efec; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

Copy link
Collaborator

@kwankyu kwankyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks !

vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
    
avoid one use of `sage_eval` by better communication with `magma`

### 📝 Checklist

- [x] The title is concise and informative.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.
    
URL: sagemath#38652
Reported by: Frédéric Chapoton
Reviewer(s): Kwankyu Lee
@vbraun vbraun merged commit 3d98d9e into sagemath:develop Sep 29, 2024
20 checks passed
@fchapoton fchapoton deleted the no_sage_eval_mestre branch September 29, 2024 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants