-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add CI with GitHub Actions #675
Conversation
I haven't been able to test the tmpfs patch as I'm using So far so good! :)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for working on this.
That is cool to see such a concise refactoring to make it work with pytest ... but if still uses nose -- why to add pytest?
also left other questions -- just curious on the choices made etc
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <[email protected]>
Hey there! Thanks for the feedback! Regarding pytest, I don't think I had a clear reason behind it more than "I can't get the tests working and nose is deprecated so let's try this" 🤣 In any case, given that nose is deprecated I do think is a good idea to start moving to pytest (even if just a bit at a time) as we will likely run into packaging issues in upcoming distro releases. There's also nose2, which I haven't ever used but it's obviously up for discussion. As for the Anyways, I think I addressed everything, but let me know if I missed something :) |
From the log, some things I want to check (not necessarily before merging, but important nonetheless):
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, there was prior attempt to migrate to pytest
would be nice if someone reviewed/reattempted . Although I am still not 100% sure it is worth adding pytest
in addition to nose
, since some folks might try to run tests using pytest, it would actually be useful. Thus overall I feel that this PR is now "to the point" enough and would be great to get CI going again.
pytest
binary instead ofnosetest
.