Fix unnecessary JINJA indentation in State files #316
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stratusjerry
force-pushed
the
indent_fix
branch
from
1788947
to
79d2d47
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)
What type of PR is this?
[refactor]A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature[docs]Documentation changesDoes this PR introduce a
BREAKING CHANGE?No.
Related issues and/or pull requests
N/A
Describe the changes you're proposing
This fixes unnecessary JINJA indentation in State files (that are typically indented after the import statement), for easier readability. Additionally, whitespace changes in JINJA indentation should not cause rendering issues