Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(common): use strings.ToLower for LOG_DOCKER env variable check to improve code readability and maintainability #1035

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

againest1
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…ck to improve code readability and maintainability
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (2e627f7) 48.04% compared to head (d67e56f) 48.05%.

Files Patch % Lines
common/cmd/cmd.go 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1035   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    48.04%   48.05%           
========================================
  Files          101      101           
  Lines        10695    10695           
========================================
+ Hits          5138     5139    +1     
+ Misses        5127     5126    -1     
  Partials       430      430           
Flag Coverage Δ
common 55.05% <0.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
coordinator 18.91% <ø> (ø)
database 42.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@0xmountaintop 0xmountaintop changed the title readability improve refactor(common): use strings.ToLower for LOG_DOCKER env variable check to improve code readability and maintainability Dec 11, 2023
@0xmountaintop
Copy link
Contributor

rollup tests seem be broken by #1032

@0xmountaintop 0xmountaintop merged commit 566fb23 into scroll-tech:develop Dec 11, 2023
19 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants