-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PyTorch and Torchvision version update #1216
PyTorch and Torchvision version update #1216
Conversation
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Pipelines are facing Issue pytorch/pytorch#140914. |
Thanks for raising the issue. Can you look into the possibility of adding the monkey patch to pytorch/pytorch#140914 (comment) If it works, we can maybe implement it while we wait for a more robust upstream solution, or we can investigate where/how |
Thank you @kta-intel. Workaround patch worked. |
Thanks for checking into that @tanwarsh. Glad 2.4.1 is not raising the TypeError issue. My open now is if downgrading |
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
@kta-intel , I tried few things, trying different version and patches suggested in few issues logged in setuptools github repo but none of them are working. Looks like we are stuck with this solution. |
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: yes <[email protected]>
@psfoley @kta-intel @teoparvanov @rahulga1,
Please review this PR and share your thoughts so that we can move forward. |
I am okay with the patch for now, though we should keep it in the backlog to look for a more robust solution |
This issue is not seen in torch==2.3.1, but the PR is to update torch from 2.3.1 because we were facing this issue #1075 |
I was asking if patching |
@kta-intel , sorry for the misunderstanding. I tested this in local. This patch works with version 2.3.1 as well. User will not have to modify anything. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @tanwarsh, thanks for upgrading the PyTorch workspaces to 2.4.1! I see this PR as an intermediate step on our "journey" to 2.5.
1c50c0f
into
securefederatedai:develop
Update PyTorch to version 2.4.1 and Torchvision to version 0.19.1.
Fix for #1075.