Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update CODEOWNERS #206

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2024
Merged

chore: update CODEOWNERS #206

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2024

Conversation

aasseman
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@aasseman aasseman requested a review from gusinacio January 15, 2024 18:53
@aasseman aasseman self-assigned this Jan 15, 2024
@aasseman aasseman requested a review from ColePBryan as a code owner January 15, 2024 18:53

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7589615916

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 73.516%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7547552783: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1313
Relevant Lines: 1786

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Contributor

@ColePBryan ColePBryan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is only appropriate that I review this 😄

Signed-off-by: Alexis Asseman <[email protected]>
@aasseman aasseman force-pushed the aasseman/update_codeowners branch from 0328fc6 to a39d234 Compare January 19, 2024 21:58
@aasseman aasseman enabled auto-merge (squash) January 19, 2024 21:59
Copy link

🤖 Cargo Audit Report 🤖

(Empty means OK! 👍)

@aasseman aasseman merged commit 2f7c268 into main Jan 19, 2024
8 checks passed
@aasseman aasseman deleted the aasseman/update_codeowners branch January 20, 2024 02:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants