Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.2.0] #356

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023
Merged

[2.2.0] #356

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

maaaNu
Copy link
Collaborator

@maaaNu maaaNu commented Oct 28, 2023

No description provided.

~ Enhanced clarity and detail in the README.md documentation. Improvements include:
  - Refined explanations of middleware functionalities and usage.
  - Fixed the usage of the middleware api in the examples
  - Improved grammatical structure and readability throughout the document.
  - Restructured sections for better logical flow and understanding.
+ Introduced responseValidation functionality in the middleware. This new feature enhances the robustness of your applications by enabling schema validation for handlers' responses.
+ Implemented the capability to dynamically enable or disable middleware functions within the execution flow. This addition brings conditional processing to your middleware stack, allowing greater control based on runtime conditions or application logic. Functions can now be seamlessly included or excluded from the execution process by resolving to true or false through a new integration pattern. This feature ensures that your application maintains high efficiency and adaptability in handling requests and processing logic.
@maaaNu maaaNu changed the title Feature/add response validation [2.2.0] Oct 28, 2023
@maaaNu maaaNu requested a review from frudisch October 30, 2023 19:33
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Florian Rudisch <[email protected]>
@maaaNu maaaNu merged commit dbd8cd5 into master Nov 1, 2023
@maaaNu maaaNu deleted the feature/add-response-validation branch November 1, 2023 12:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants