Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v6.0.1 #793

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

Release v6.0.1 #793

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

pgrzesik
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@pgrzesik pgrzesik force-pushed the release branch 3 times, most recently from 509af39 to 814af78 Compare October 30, 2023 07:08
@pgrzesik pgrzesik merged commit 84ee8c5 into master Nov 2, 2023
2 checks passed
@pgrzesik pgrzesik deleted the release branch November 2, 2023 08:49
mLupine added a commit to mLupine/serverless-python-requirements that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2023
* master:
  Release v6.0.1 (serverless#793)
  ci: Temporarily disable test run on integrate (serverless#800)
  ci: Temporarily minimize testing matrix (serverless#799)
  ci: Fix test skips (serverless#797)
  ci: Temp skip of cache-related tests (serverless#796)
  ci: Remove node12 from testing matrix (serverless#795)
  fix: Not crash when runtime is not `python` (serverless#773)
  fix: Remove outdated Pipenv requirements flag (serverless#780)
  fix: Fix integration test matrix configuration (serverless#755)
  fix: Add legacy `pipenv` backward compatability (serverless#742)
  Add support for specifying custom dependency groups in Poetry (serverless#746)
  docs: Add contributing and code of conduct

# Conflicts:
#	test.js
@MaG21
Copy link

MaG21 commented Nov 17, 2023

This pull request is a breaking change for me. Why is this a problem (at least for me)? Because this project doesn't include a package-lock.json file, it's becoming really difficult to revert back to version v6.0.0. I don't have the list of dependencies of the old version.

Please consider adding a package-lock.json file.

@pgrzesik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @MaG21 - thanks for reporting. What exactly is breaking for you?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants