Today in Kubernetes, the exposure of secrets for connecting application workloads to external services such as REST APIs, databases, event buses, and many more is manual and bespoke. Each service provider suggests a different way to access their secrets, and application developers consume these secrets in a way specific to each workload. While there is a good deal of value to this flexibility, large development teams lose overall velocity dealing with each unique solution. To combat this, we see teams adopting internal patterns for how to achieve this workload-to-service linkage.
This specification aims to create a Kubernetes-wide specification for communicating service secrets to workloads in a consistent way. It aims to create a widely applicable mechanism without excluding other strategies for systems that it does not fit easily. The benefit of Kubernetes-wide specification is that all of the actors in an ecosystem can work towards a clearly defined abstraction at the edge of their expertise and depend on other parties to complete the chain.
- Application Developers expect their secrets to be presented consistently and predictably within a container.
- Service Providers expect their secrets to be collected and exposed to consumers consistently and predictably.
- Platforms expect to retrieve secrets from Service Providers and expose them to Application Developers consistently and predictably.
The pattern of Service Binding has prior art in non-Kubernetes platforms. Heroku pioneered this model with Add-ons, and Cloud Foundry adopted similar ideas with their Services. Other open source projects like the Open Service Broker aim to help with this pattern on those non-Kubernetes platforms. In the Kubernetes ecosystem, the CNCF Sandbox Cloud Native Buildpacks project has proposed a buildpack-specific specification exclusively addressing the application developer portion of this pattern.
The Service Binding Specification for Kubernetes project is a community lead effort. A bi-weekly working group call is open to the public. Discussions occur here on GitHub and on the #bindings-discuss channel in the Kubernetes Slack.
If you catch an error in the specification’s text, or if you write an implementation, please let us know by opening an issue or pull request at our GitHub repository.
Participation in the Service Binding community is governed by the Contributor Covenant.
- Service Binding Specification for Kubernetes
- Provisioned Service
- Workload Projection
- Service Binding
- Direct Secret Reference
- Workload Resource Mapping
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
This document is a working draft of the Service Bindings for Kubernetes specification, representing the collective efforts of the community. It is published for early implementors and users to provide feedback. Releases of the specification are published on the main website.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 RFC2119 RFC8174 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
The key words "unspecified", "undefined", and "implementation-defined" are to be interpreted as described in the rationale for the C99 standard.
An implementation is not compliant if it fails to satisfy one or more of the MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, or SHALL NOT requirements for the protocols it implements. An implementation is compliant if it satisfies all the MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, and SHALL NOT requirements for the protocols it implements.
- Duck Type
- Any type that meets the contract defined in a specification, without being an instance of a specific concrete type. For example, for a specification that requires a given key on
status, any resource that has that key on itsstatusregardless of itsapiVersionorkindwould be considered to implement that duck type. - Service
- Any software that exposes functionality. Examples include a database, a message broker, a workload with REST endpoints, an event stream, an Application Performance Monitor, or a Hardware Security Module.
- Workload
- A workload is an application running on Kubernetes. Examples include processing using a framework like Spring Boot, NodeJS Express, or Ruby on Rails. Workloads are the part of an application that runs. Workloads may colloquially be referred to as an application.
- Service Binding
- The act of or representation of the action of providing information about a Service to a Workload
- Secret
- A Kubernetes
Secret PodSpec-able Duck Type- A Kubernetes resource where
.spec.templateattribute conforms to a Kubernetes Pod's spec. Examples of resources include DaemonSet, Deployment, Job, and StatefulSet.
A Provisioned Service resource MUST define a .status.binding field which is a LocalObjectReference-able (containing a single field name) to a Secret. The Secret MUST exist in the same namespace as the resource. The Secret data SHOULD contain a type entry with a value that identifies the abstract classification of the binding. The Secret type (.type verses .data.type fields) SHOULD reflect this value as servicebinding.io/{type}, substituting {type} with the Secret data type. It is RECOMMENDED that the Secret data also contain a provider entry with a value that identifies the provider of the binding. The Secret data MAY contain any other entry. To facilitate discoverability, it is RECOMMENDED that a CustomResourceDefinition exposing a Provisioned Service add servicebinding.io/provisioned-service: "true" as a label.
Note: While the Provisioned Service referenced
Secretdata should contain atypeentry, thetypemust be defined as it is projected to a workload. The relaxation of the requirement for provisioned services allows for a mapping to enrich an existing secret. For example,ServiceBindinghas fields to overridetypeandprovidervalues.
Extensions and implementations MAY define additional mechanisms to consume a Provisioned Service that does not conform to the duck type.
status:
binding:
name: # string...
status:
...
binding:
name: production-db-secretOther than the recommended type and provider entries, there are no other reserved Secret entries. In the interests of consistency, if a Secret includes any of the following entry names, the entry value MUST meet the specified requirements:
| Name | Requirements |
|---|---|
host |
A DNS-resolvable host name or IP address |
port |
A valid port number |
uri |
A valid URI as defined by RFC3986 |
username |
A string-based username credential |
password |
A string-based password credential |
certificates |
A collection of PEM-encoded X.509 public certificates, representing a certificate chain used to trust TLS connections |
private-key |
A PEM-encoded private key used in mTLS client authentication |
Secret entries that do not meet these requirements MUST use different entry names.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: production-db-secret
type: servicebinding.io/mysql
stringData:
type: mysql
provider: bitnami
host: localhost
port: 3306
username: root
password: rootCluster operators and CRD authors SHOULD opt-in resources to expose provisioned services by defining a ClusterRole with a label matching servicebinding.io/controller=true. The get, list, and watch verbs MUST be granted in the ClusterRole.
See Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for how the ClusterRole is consumed.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: awesome-service-bindings
labels:
servicebinding.io/controller: "true" # matches the aggregation rule selector
rules:
- apiGroups:
- awesome.example.com
resources:
- awesomeservices
verbs:
- get
- list
- watchA projected binding MUST be volume mounted into a container at $SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT/<binding-name> with directory names matching the name of the binding. Binding names MUST match [a-z0-9\-\.]{1,253}. The $SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT environment variable MUST be declared and can point to any valid file system location.
The projected binding MUST contain a type entry with a value that identifies the abstract classification of the binding. It is RECOMMENDED that the projected binding also contain a provider entry with a value that identifies the provider of the binding. The projected binding data MAY contain any other entry. Directories under $SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT that do not contain a type entry SHOULD be ignored by the workload process at runtime.
The name of a binding entry file name SHOULD match [a-z0-9\-\.]{1,253}. The contents of a binding entry may be anything representable as bytes on the file system including, but not limited to, a literal string value (e.g. db-password), a language-specific binary (e.g. a Java KeyStore with a private key and X.509 certificate), or an indirect pointer to another system for value resolution (e.g. vault://production-database/password).
The collection of files within the directory MAY change during the lifetime of the container or between container launches.
Users SHOULD ensure each binding has a unique name. The behavior for name collisions is undefined. Implementations MAY attempt a good faith check for collisions to provide a meaningful error message.
$SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT
├── account-database
│ ├── type
│ ├── provider
│ ├── uri
│ ├── username
│ └── password
└── transaction-event-stream
├── type
├── connection-count
├── uri
├── certificates
└── private-key
Cluster operators and CRD authors SHOULD opt-in resources to binding projection by defining a ClusterRole with a label matching servicebinding.io/controller=true. The get, list, watch, update, and patch verbs MUST be granted in the ClusterRole.
See Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for how the ClusterRole is consumed.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: awesome-service-bindings
labels:
servicebinding.io/controller: "true" # matches the aggregation rule selector
rules:
- apiGroups:
- awesome.example.com
resources:
- awesomeworkloads
verbs:
- get
- list
- watch
- update
- patchA Service Binding describes the connection between a Provisioned Service and a Workload Projection. It MUST be codified as a concrete resource type with API version servicebinding.io/v1 and kind ServiceBinding. An implementation MAY support other versions of this specification which define additional API versions. Multiple ServiceBinding objects can refer to the same service. Multiple ServiceBinding objects can refer to the same workload. For portability, the schema MUST comply to the exemplar CRD found here.
Note: Restricting service binding to resources within the same namespace is strongly recommended. Implementations that choose to support cross-namespace service binding must provide a security model that prevents attacks like privilege escalation and secret enumeration, as well as a deterministic way to declare target namespaces.
A ServiceBinding MUST define a .spec.workload which is an ObjectReference-like declaration. A ServiceBinding MAY define the workload reference by-name or by-label selector. A name and selector MUST NOT be defined in the same reference. A ServiceBinding MUST define a .spec.service which is an ObjectReference-like declaration to a Provisioned Service-able resource. Extensions and implementations MAY allow additional kinds of workloads and services to be referenced.
The ServiceBinding MAY define .spec.workload.containers, to limit which containers in the workload are bound. If .spec.workload.containers is defined, the value MUST be a list of strings. Binding to a container is opt-in, unless .spec.workload.containers is undefined then all containers MUST be bound. For each item in the containers list:
- a container matched by name MUST be bound
- values that do not match a container SHOULD be ignored
A ServiceBinding MAY define a .spec.env which is an array of EnvMapping. An EnvMapping object MUST define name and key entries. The key of an EnvMapping MUST refer to a binding Secret key name. The value of this Secret entry MUST be configured as an environment variable on the resource represented by workload.
A ServiceBinding MUST define .status.conditions which is an array of Condition objects as defined in meta/v1 Condition. At least one condition containing a type of Ready MUST be defined by the implementation. The Ready condition SHOULD contain appropriate values. As label selectors are inherently queries that return zero-to-many resources, it is RECOMMENDED that ServiceBinding authors use a combination of labels that yield a single resource, but implementors MUST handle each matching resource as if it was specified by name in a distinct ServiceBinding. Partial failures MUST be aggregated and reported on the binding status's Ready condition. A ServiceBinding SHOULD reflect the secret projected into the workload as .status.binding.name.
When updating the status of the ServiceBinding, the controller MUST set the value of .status.observedGeneration to the value of .metadata.generation. The .metadata.generation field is always the current generation of the ServiceBinding, which is incremented by the API server when writes are made to the ServiceBinding spec field. Therefore, consumers SHOULD compare the value of the observed and current generations to know if the status reflects the current resource definition.
apiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ServiceBinding
metadata:
name: # string
generation: # int64, defined by the Kubernetes control plane
...
spec:
name: # string, optional, default: .metadata.name
type: # string, optional
provider: # string, optional
service: # Provisioned Service resource ObjectReference-like
apiVersion: # string
kind: # string
name: # string
workload: # ObjectReference-like
apiVersion: # string
kind: # string
name: # string, mutually exclusive with selector
selector: # metav1.LabelSelector, mutually exclusive with name
containers: # []string, optional
env: # []EnvMapping, optional
- name: # string
key: # string
status:
binding: # LocalObjectReference, optional
name: # string
conditions: # []metav1.Condition containing at least one entry for `Ready`
observedGeneration: # int64apiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ServiceBinding
metadata:
name: account-service
spec:
service:
apiVersion: com.example/v1alpha1
kind: AccountService
name: prod-account-service
workload:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
name: online-banking
status:
conditions:
- type: Ready
status: 'True'
reason: 'Projected'
message: ''
lastTransitionTime: '2021-01-20T17:00:00Z'apiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ServiceBinding
metadata:
name: online-banking-frontend-to-account-service
spec:
name: account-service
service:
apiVersion: com.example/v1alpha1
kind: AccountService
name: prod-account-service
workload:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
selector:
matchLabels:
app.kubernetes.io/part-of: online-banking
app.kubernetes.io/component: frontend
status:
conditions:
- type: Ready
status: 'True'
reason: 'Projected'
message: ''
lastTransitionTime: '2021-01-20T17:00:00Z'apiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ServiceBinding
metadata:
name: account-service
spec:
service:
apiVersion: com.example/v1alpha1
kind: AccountService
name: prod-account-service
workload:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
name: online-banking
env:
- name: ACCOUNT_SERVICE_HOST
key: host
- name: ACCOUNT_SERVICE_USERNAME
key: username
- name: ACCOUNT_SERVICE_PASSWORD
key: password
status:
binding:
name: prod-account-service-projection
conditions:
- type: Ready
status: 'True'
reason: 'Projected'
message: ''
lastTransitionTime: '2021-01-20T17:00:00Z'A Reconciler implementation for the ServiceBinding type is responsible for binding the Provisioned Service binding Secret into a workload. The Secret referred to by .status.binding on the resource represented by service MUST be mounted as a volume on the resource represented by workload.
If a .spec.name is set, the directory name of the volume mount MUST be its value. If a .spec.name is not set, the directory name of the volume mount SHOULD be the value of .metadata.name.
For each container to be bound, if the $SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT environment variable has already been configured on the resource represented by workload, the Provisioned Service binding Secret MUST be mounted relative to that location. If the $SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT environment variable has not been configured on the resource represented by workload, the $SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT environment variable MUST be set and the Provisioned Service binding Secret MUST be mounted relative to that location. A RECOMMENDED value to use is /bindings.
The $SERVICE_BINDING_ROOT environment variable MUST NOT be reset if it is already configured on the resource represented by workload.
If a .spec.type is set, the type entry in the workload projection MUST be set to its value overriding any existing value. If a .spec.provider is set, the provider entry in the workload projection MUST be set to its value overriding any existing value.
The ServiceBinding status MUST be updated for the result of an error when the implementation is unable to retry the binding, or user interaction is required to recover from the error. For example, when updating a workload resource to project a binding a conflict SHOULD NOT be reflected because retrying may allow the update to succeed. A not found error fetching the workload resource SHOULD be reflected as the error is not recoverable until the target workload resource is created. An implementation MAY record an event as a result of any error.
If the service binding is completed successfully, the Ready condition status MUST be set to True. If the service binding cannot be completed, including cases where the service or workload resource are not found or do not conform to the specification requirements, the Ready condition status MUST be set to False. If the Ready condition status is neither actively True nor False it SHOULD be set to Unknown.
If the referenced Provisioned Service exists and exposes a binding secret, the ServiceAvailable condition status MUST be set to True. If the referenced Provisioned Service either does not exist, or it cannot be determined if the resource exists, the ServiceAvailable condition status MUST be set to False with a meaningful message. If the ServiceAvailable condition status is neither actively True nor False it SHOULD be set to Unknown.
There are scenarios where an appropriate resource conforming to the Provisioned Service duck-type does not exist, but there is a Secret available for binding. This feature allows a ServiceBinding to directly reference a Secret.
When the .spec.service.kind attribute is Secret and .spec.service.apiVersion is v1, the .spec.service.name attribute MUST be treated as .status.binding.name for a Provisioned Service.
apiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ServiceBinding
metadata:
name: account-service
spec:
service:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
name: prod-account-service-secret
workload:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
name: online-banking
status:
binding:
name: prod-account-service-reference
conditions:
- type: Ready
status: 'True'
reason: 'Projected'
message: ''
lastTransitionTime: '2021-01-20T17:00:00Z'A workload resource mapping describes how to apply service binding transformations to a workload projection. It MUST be codified as a concrete resource type (cluster scoped resource) with API version servicebinding.io/v1 and kind ClusterWorkloadResourceMapping. An implementation MAY support other versions of this specification which define additional API versions. For portability, the schema MUST comply to the exemplar CRD found here.
A workload resource mapping MUST define its name using CRD syntax (<plural>.<group>) for the resource that it defines a mapping for. A workload resource mapping MUST define a .spec.versions which is an array of MappingTemplate fragments.
A MappingTemplate fragment MUST define at least one version entry that represents a version of the mapped resource. The version entry MAY contain a * wildcard which indicates that this mapping should be used for any version that does not have a mapping explicitly defined for it. A MappingTemplate fragment MAY define annotations, as a string containing a Fixed JSONPath that describes the location of a map of annotations in the target resource. If not specified, the default annotations expression MUST be appropriate for mapping to a PodSpec-able resource (.spec.template.metadata.annotations). A MappingTemplate fragment MAY define containers, as an array of MappingContainer fragments. If not specified, the default MappingContainer MUST be appropriate for mapping to a PodSpec-able resource. A MappingTemplate fragment MAY define volumes, as a string containing a Fixed JSONPath that describes the location of []Volume arrays in the target resource. If not specified, the default volumes expression MUST be appropriate for mapping to a PodSpec-able resource (.spec.template.spec.volumes).
A MappingContainer fragment MUST define a path entry which is a string containing a JSONPath that references container like locations in the target resource. The following expressions MUST be applied to each object matched by the path. A MappingTemplate object MAY define name, as a string containing a Fixed JSONPath that describes the location of a string in the target resource that names the container. A MappingTemplate object MAY define env, as a string containing a Fixed JSONPath that describes the location of []EnvVar array in the target resource. If not specified, the default env expression MUST be appropriate for mapping within an actual Container object (.env). A MappingTemplate object MAY define volumeMounts, as a string containing a Fixed JSONPath that describes the location of []VolumeMount array in the target resource. If not specified, the default env expression MUST be appropriate for mapping within an actual Container object (.volumeMounts).
Note: Only expressions labeled as 'Fixed JSONPath' MUST conform to this requirement. Other expressions MAY use the full JSONPath syntax.
A Fixed JSONPath is a subset of JSONPath expressions that MUST NOT use type and operators other than fields separated by the child operator. This grammar allows accessing nested fields via a single, fixed path.
For example, these expressions are allowed:
.name['name'].spec.template.spec.volumes.spec['template'].spec['volumes']
All other types and operators are disallowed, including but not limited to:
- texts
- identifiers
- filters
- ints
- floats
- wildcards
- recursives
- unions
- bools
apiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ClusterWorkloadResourceMapping
metadata:
name: # string
generation: # int64, defined by the Kubernetes control plane
...
spec:
versions: # []MappingTemplate
- version: # string
annotations: # string (Fixed JSONPath), optional
containers: # []MappingContainer, optional
- path: # string (JSONPath)
name: # string (Fixed JSONPath), optional
env: # string (Fixed JSONPath), optional
volumeMounts: # string (Fixed JSONPath), optional
volumes: # string (Fixed JSONPath), optionalapiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ClusterWorkloadResourceMapping
metadata:
name: cronjobs.batch
spec:
versions:
- version: "*"
annotations: .spec.jobTemplate.spec.template.metadata.annotations
containers:
- path: .spec.jobTemplate.spec.template.spec.containers[*]
name: .name
env: .env # this is the default value
volumeMounts: .volumeMounts # this is the default value
- path: .spec.jobTemplate.spec.template.spec.initContainers[*]
name: .name
env: .env # this is the default value
volumeMounts: .volumeMounts # this is the default value
volumes: .spec.jobTemplate.spec.template.spec.volumesapiVersion: servicebinding.io/v1
kind: ClusterWorkloadResourceMapping
metadata:
name: deployments.apps
spec:
versions:
- version: "*"
annotations: .spec.template.metadata.annotations
containers:
- path: .spec.template.spec.containers[*]
name: .name
env: .env
volumeMounts: .volumeMounts
- path: .spec.template.spec.initContainers[*]
name: .name
env: .env
volumeMounts: .volumeMounts
volumes: .spec.template.spec.volumesNote: This example is equivalent to not specifying a mapping or specifying an empty mapping.
When a ClusterWorkloadResourceMapping is defined in the cluster matching a workload resource it MUST be used to map the binding that type. If no mapping is available for the type, the implementation MUST treat the workload resource as a PodSpec-able type.
When a service binding projection is removed, the controller MUST use the same mappings from the projection creation. After a ClusterWorkloadResourceMapping resource is modified, each binding targeting the mapped workload type MUST be removed, then reattempted with the latest mapping.
If a ServiceBinding specifies .spec.workload.containers and a MappingContainer specifies a name expression, the resolved name MUST limit which containers in the workload are bound. If either key is not defined, the container SHOULD be bound.
An implementation MUST create empty values at locations referenced by Fixed JSONPaths that do not exist on the workload resource. Values referenced by JSONPaths in both the MappingTemplate and MappingContainer fragments MUST be mutated by a ServiceBinding reconciler as if they were defined directly by a corev1.PodTemplateSpec. A reconciler MUST preserve fields on the workload resource that fall outside the specific fragments and types defined by the mapping.
Kubernetes clusters often utilize Role-based access control (RBAC) to authorize subjects to perform specific actions on resources. When operating in a cluster with RBAC enabled, the service binding reconciler needs permission to read resources that provisioned a service and write resources that services are projected into. This section defines a means for third-party CRD authors and cluster operators to expose resources to the service binding reconciler. Cluster operators MAY impose additional access controls beyond RBAC.
If a service binding reconciler implementation is using Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) it MUST define an aggregated ClusterRole with a label selector matching the label servicebinding.io/controller=true. This ClusterRole MUST be bound (RoleBinding for a single namespace or ClusterRoleBinding if cluster-wide) to the subject the service binding reconciler runs as, typically a ServiceAccount.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
name: ...
aggregationRule:
clusterRoleSelectors:
- matchLabels:
servicebinding.io/controller: "true"
rules: [] # The control plane automatically fills in the rules