Skip to content

Conversation

justin808
Copy link
Member

Summary

  • Updated basic-v16-webpack demo to use shakapacker 9.0.0.beta.5 instead of GitHub reference
  • Fixed .new-demo-versions to use proper version specifier instead of GitHub ref
  • Applied rubocop auto-fixes for string literal style

Changes

  • Gemfile: Changed from "~> 9.3.beta.5", github: "shakacode/shakapacker" to '~> 9.0.0.beta.5'
  • package.json: Changed from "github:shakacode/shakapacker" to "9.0.0-beta.5"
  • .new-demo-versions: Changed from "github:shakacode/shakapacker" to "~> 9.0.0.beta.5"
  • Updated lock files for both Ruby and npm

Test plan

  • Linting passes (rubocop)
  • Pre-commit and pre-push hooks pass
  • Basic-v16-webpack demo runs successfully

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

- Update Gemfile to use shakapacker ~> 9.0.0.beta.5 instead of GitHub ref
- Update package.json to use shakapacker 9.0.0-beta.5
- Update Gemfile.lock and package-lock.json
- Fix .new-demo-versions to use proper version instead of GitHub ref
- Apply rubocop auto-fixes for string literal style

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 19, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@justin808 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8850f2f and db8a1ce.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/Gemfile.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (35)
  • .new-demo-versions (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/Gemfile (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/Rakefile (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/app/controllers/hello_world_controller.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/app/mailers/application_mailer.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/brakeman (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/bundle (5 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/dev (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/rails (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/rake (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/rubocop (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/setup (2 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/shakapacker (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/shakapacker-dev-server (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/bin/thrust (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config.ru (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/application.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/boot.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/environment.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/environments/development.rb (3 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/environments/production.rb (4 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/environments/test.rb (2 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/initializers/assets.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/initializers/cypress_on_rails.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/initializers/react_on_rails.rb (3 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/puma.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/config/routes.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/e2e/playwright/app_commands/activerecord_fixtures.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/e2e/playwright/app_commands/clean.rb (2 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/e2e/playwright/app_commands/log_fail.rb (2 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/e2e/playwright/app_commands/scenarios/basic.rb (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/e2e/playwright/e2e_helper.rb (2 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/lib/tasks/e2e.rake (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/package.json (1 hunks)
  • demos/basic-v16-webpack/test/test_helper.rb (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch justin808/shakapacker-9-beta-5

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 19, 2025

PR Review: Update basic-v16-webpack demo to shakapacker 9.0.0.beta.5

Summary

This PR transitions the basic-v16-webpack demo from using a GitHub reference for shakapacker to the published beta version 9.0.0.beta.5. The changes are well-structured and consistent.


✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

  • Consistent style updates: RuboCop auto-fixes applied uniformly across all Ruby files, converting double quotes to single quotes per Ruby style guide
  • Proper version specifier: Changed from GitHub reference to semantic versioning (~> 9.0.0.beta.5), which is more stable and appropriate for demos
  • Lock file consistency: Both Gemfile.lock and package-lock.json properly updated to reflect dependency changes
  • .new-demo-versions alignment: Updated the template configuration to match, ensuring future demos use the correct version

Minor observation:

  • The version change in Gemfile went from ~> 9.3.beta.5 (GitHub) to ~> 9.0.0.beta.5 (published). This version number decrease (9.3 → 9.0) suggests the GitHub branch was ahead of the published beta. This is intentional and correct for using published releases.

🐛 Potential Issues

Critical - Test Plan Incomplete:
The PR description shows the test plan item "Basic-v16-webpack demo runs successfully" is unchecked. This is concerning because:

  1. This is a dependency version change that could introduce breaking changes
  2. The demo should be verified to work before merging
  3. Version incompatibilities could break the demo for users

Recommendation: Please run the demo and verify:

cd demos/basic-v16-webpack
bundle install
npm install
bin/setup
bin/dev
# Visit http://localhost:3000/hello_world and confirm it works

Version alignment concern:

  • Gemfile.lock shows shakapacker version is now 9.0.0 (not 9.0.0.beta.5)
  • This suggests the published version might be 9.0.0 rather than 9.0.0.beta.5
  • Please verify the correct version is actually published to RubyGems and npm

🔒 Security Concerns

No security issues identified:

  • Dependencies upgraded to published versions (more trustworthy than GitHub refs)
  • No sensitive data in changes
  • Lock files properly updated (reduces supply chain risk)

⚡ Performance Considerations

Positive impacts:

  • Using published gem versions enables better caching in CI/CD
  • Eliminates GitHub API rate limiting issues during bundle install
  • Faster installation compared to GitHub references

No negative impacts expected - this is a dependency version update without code changes.


🧪 Test Coverage

Current state:

  • ✅ Linting passes (rubocop) - confirmed in test plan
  • ✅ Pre-commit and pre-push hooks pass - confirmed in test plan
  • Demo functionality not verified - needs to be completed

Recommendations:

  1. Complete the test plan - run the demo and confirm it works
  2. CI validation - if this repo has CI, ensure it runs against this PR
  3. Consider adding a smoke test - automated test that verifies the demo starts successfully

📝 Additional Notes

Dependency version in package.json:
The npm package uses exact version 9.0.0-beta.5 while the Ruby gem uses pessimistic constraint ~> 9.0.0.beta.5. This is fine since:

  • npm doesn't need the ~> operator (uses semantic versioning differently)
  • The versions match semantically

RuboCop changes:
All the quote style changes (double → single) are cosmetic improvements that follow Ruby community standards. These don't affect functionality but improve consistency.


🎯 Verdict

Conditional approval - the code changes look good, but please:

  1. Complete the test plan - verify the demo runs successfully
  2. Verify version numbers - confirm 9.0.0.beta.5 is the correct published version
  3. Document any breaking changes - if the version upgrade requires any configuration changes

Once the demo is confirmed working, this PR is ready to merge. The changes are well-structured and follow best practices for dependency management.


Review generated with attention to code quality, security, performance, and test coverage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant