Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: invalidate taproot addresses for sends #7819

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

0xApotheosis
Copy link
Contributor

@0xApotheosis 0xApotheosis commented Sep 26, 2024

Description

Updates the validateAddress util to return invalid for BTC Taproot addresses.

A stop-gap to improve user experience relating to #6761 until we decided how to proceed/unblock that ticket.

Issue (if applicable)

Relates to #6761, but does not close it.

Risk

High Risk PRs Require 2 approvals

Low

What protocols, transaction types, wallets or contract interactions might be affected by this PR?

BTC sends

Testing

Ensure BTC sends to Taproot addresses (e.g. bc1pxk2u9kjszfzxqmsrcctvst32dn2pqrlptsw0e7wqumhlq9cl35ks9v5kh2 are invalidated):

Screenshot 2024-09-26 at 14 19 27

Ensure no other sends are affected.

Engineering

☝️

Operations

  • 🏁 My feature is behind a flag and doesn't require operations testing (yet)

☝️

Screenshots (if applicable)

See above.

@0xApotheosis 0xApotheosis requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 04:19
Copy link
Contributor

@gomesalexandre gomesalexandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Locally tested, on the box what it does, it says!

Develop:

Screenshot 2024-09-26 at 10 14 23

This diff:

image

@gomesalexandre gomesalexandre merged commit d43939c into develop Sep 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@gomesalexandre gomesalexandre deleted the invalidate-taproot-sends branch September 26, 2024 08:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants