-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 537
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade to TUF v2 client #3844
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Upgrade to TUF v2 client #3844
Conversation
There is still work to do here but I will be out for a couple of weeks so it might be worth getting some eyes on in the meantime. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3844 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 40.10% 35.91% -4.19%
==========================================
Files 155 205 +50
Lines 10044 12977 +2933
==========================================
+ Hits 4028 4661 +633
- Misses 5530 7751 +2221
- Partials 486 565 +79 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
e59faee
to
07e1c38
Compare
00b4edb
to
820d6a8
Compare
sorry, I missed this at the time: I will have a look today or monday |
Can you specify what cosign does with sigstore-go? I can see there are some invidual target fetches in the code but does cosign now use trusted_root.json by default? |
Cosign uses sigstore-go piecemeal for various things, but the goal of this PR is to adopt sigstore-go's TUF client wrapper instead of the client wrapper provided by sigstore/sigstore.
It does not, that's part of the purpose of this PR and #3548. There is another PR in progress #3854 that adds a --trusted-root flag that I will have to adjust this PR to conform with.
I may now have to wait for that other PR to be fleshed out before I can make active progress on this, so don't feel rushed to review this. I can ping you again when it's in a more stable state. |
const ( | ||
// This is the root in the fulcio project. | ||
fulcioTargetStr = `fulcio.crt.pem` | ||
// This is the v1 migrated root. | ||
fulcioV1TargetStr = `fulcio_v1.crt.pem` | ||
// This is the untrusted v1 intermediate CA certificate, used or chain building. | ||
fulcioV1IntermediateTargetStr = `fulcio_intermediate_v1.crt.pem` | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if these filenames should be configurable somewhere for private Sigstore TUF operators. The existing metadata format allows for additional targets to be added and discovered, but TUF v2 does not allow iterating over targets, so that strategy is unsupported, meaning this current diff does not necessarily support all private TUF deployments.
We could also provide a CLI utility to convert an old TUF v1 layout to a trusted_root.json
and require private TUF maintainers to use it to generate a trusted root in order to support the next version of cosign. I kind of like this option as it fast tracks the adoption of the trusted root.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if these filenames should be configurable somewhere for private Sigstore TUF operators
These filenames are hardcoded in the TUF v1 code so recreating them here was an attempt to align with the old way of retrieving targets.
The existing metadata format allows for additional targets to be added and discovered, but TUF v2 does not allow iterating over targets, so that strategy is unsupported, meaning this current diff does not necessarily support all private TUF deployments.
You're right, that was an oversight on my part. I had an earlier version of this that could support discovering targets from custom metadata that I will restore.
We could also provide a CLI utility to convert an old TUF v1 layout to a trusted_root.json
We could do that as a last resort, but my hope was to maintain full backwards compatibility and ease users gently toward using trusted_root.json.
pkg/cosign/tuf.go
Outdated
func checkValidityPeriod(start, end time.Time) tufStatus { | ||
now := time.Now() | ||
if now.Before(start) { | ||
return inactive | ||
} | ||
if now.After(end) { | ||
return inactive | ||
} | ||
return active | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The validity period in the TrustedRoot should be compared to the timestamp provided by the timestamping service or transparency log. I understand this is not something that is known at the time that you are assembling the CheckOpts, and that makes this a hard problem, but I'm not sure we want to enforce this in this version of the code. I believe we still want to be able to verify a signature produced prior to a timestamping service's validity end date, even if the current time is after that date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My goal here was to have something to substitute for the Active
/Expired
status from TUF v1 that does not seem to have an equivalent in TUF v2. Open to discarding this entirely or finding an alternative.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For what it's worth, I don't think Cosign is effectively using Active/Expired now, as Cosign is only printing a message to stdout if you are verifying an entry with an "expired" key. This isn't really helpful to the user because there's nothing wrong with using an expired key, it's if the key is used to verify something outside of its validity window, which isn't currently implemented in Cosign.
If it'd be easier to just not deal with Active/Expired, I'd be supportive of that. We can either rely on sigstore-go down the line to do that check, or we can file an issue to implement that feature in Cosign's verification API when using the trusted root file. I'd lean towards the latter in line with #3879.
6c89e27
to
b992556
Compare
Swap the use of the go-tuf v0.7.0 client from sigstore/sigstore to the v2.0.0 client from sigstore/sigstore-go. This change strictly adds logic to attempt to use the sigstore-go TUF client if possible, and falls back to the old TUF client. The new client can only fetch targets by name, not by custom metadata. This means that, on its own, the new client cannot support renaming/rotating keys, so the old client must be used to support that case. A future change will add support for fetching or reading a trusted_root.json file, which has better support for rotating keys. Once this later change is introduced, using the old client can be deprecated. The logic in this change works as follows: - if a path fo a key is provided by a SIGSTORE_ environment variable, read that file and use it (same as previously) - if new environment variables TUF_MIRROR and TUF_ROOT_JSON are set, use those to instantiate a TUF client that fetches keys from the given mirror - else, try reading the mirror URL from remote.json, which set set by `cosign initialize`, and try reading the root.json from the mirror's cache directory which may have been created by a previous TUF v2 run - if fetching keys using the new client with the given mirror did not work, fallback to the v1 client Also not that the use of the "status" field in the custom TUF metadata is removed, as it was only used for human-readable feedback. TODO: - e2e tests Signed-off-by: Colleen Murphy <[email protected]>
b992556
to
84e4712
Compare
@steiza , @codysoyland , @haydentherapper and I met to discuss a path forward on this and we decided to shrink the scope of this PR by removing the fetch of trusted_root.json, to be addressed separately. This PR dropped the fetch of trusted_root.json, but it now fails conformance tests because the SCT returned during signing from p-g-i is signed by the ctfe_2022.pub key, which the sigstore-go TUF client has no way to know about. This worked fine with p-g-i when trusted_root.json was considered, but shows that this approach will break any deployment that has rotated keys relying on custom metadata. I'm starting to think that using the new client must also be synchronized with using trusted_root.json and that the whole thing should be guarded by a flag that users can opt into. Thoughts? |
Swap the use of the go-tuf v0.7.0 client from sigstore/sigstore to the
v2.0.0 client from sigstore/sigstore-go.
This change strictly adds logic to attempt to use the sigstore-go TUF
client if possible, and falls back to the old TUF client. The new client
can only fetch targets by name, not by custom metadata. This means that,
on its own, the new client cannot support renaming/rotating keys, so the
old client must be used to support that case. A future change will add
support for fetching or reading a trusted_root.json file, which has
better support for rotating keys. Once this later change is introduced, using
the old client can be deprecated.
The logic in this change works as follows:
read that file and use it (same as previously)
those to instantiate a TUF client that fetches keys from the given
mirror
cosign initialize
, and try reading the root.json from the mirror'scache directory which may have been created by a previous TUF v2 run
work, fallback to the v1 client
Also not that the use of the "status" field in the custom TUF metadata
is removed, as it was only used for human-readable feedback.
TODO:
Fixes #3548
Summary
Release Note
Documentation