Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/verification get report #16

Conversation

JPPortier
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

… unencoded path: server side is computing/validate against unencode values; so align from client side
… segment and parameters are differents (path segment 'space' encoding have to '%20' and not '+' sign)
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 24, 2023

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues found.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 2962f24.
Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

Scanned Manifest Files

Copy link

@asein-sinch asein-sinch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, great work! 🌟

…on name for verifications and status: parameters function call will let java trigger to the right service to be called
@JPPortier JPPortier merged commit d5a3fbc into feat/verification-application-auth-manager Nov 27, 2023
2 checks passed
@JPPortier JPPortier deleted the feat/verification-get-report branch November 27, 2023 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants