-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DEVEXP-381: Flexible enums for regions #54
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
454d316
DEVEXP-379: Support hostname override in SinchClient parameters
asein-sinch f0cf724
DEVEXP-380: Support plugins addition in SinchClient parameters
asein-sinch f4ef95c
Merge branch 'main' into DEVEXP-380_Support-plugins-addition-in-Sinch…
asein-sinch 1a3745e
Refactor setApplicationsManagementHostname
asein-sinch 1d921df
DEVEXP-384: Support regions for Fax API
asein-sinch 79766ea
DEVEXP-381: Flexible enums for regions
asein-sinch 6e75a86
Fix comment
asein-sinch bd9b162
Fix comments
asein-sinch 4e7b777
Merge branch 'main' into DEVEXP-381_Loose-enums-for-regions-support
asein-sinch 3387538
Fix merge issue
asein-sinch File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it come from myself, but thank you to small function usage here: my first reading of this line was cause of reflexion to understand logic and thinking there was a issue:
🤔
Then I realized the final dot for second case; then use to format a string
Just a personal thought I think I would have written logic as
const formattedRegion = region !== '' ? `${region}.` '';
Which could highlight in a better way the logic and use case.
Again just a personal thought and not a blocker
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right, it would be more readable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed for all 4 APIs that use regions