Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[k8s] Robust service account and namespace support #3632
[k8s] Robust service account and namespace support #3632
Changes from all commits
83091d7
74528ce
d61f10a
e04b63e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we change the
sky-sa
name above the same as the default name in our codebase, so after creation, the user does not need to specify it in a~/.sky/config.yaml
(we can still mention that a user can change the name of the service account and specify the config yaml, but we should keep the service account creation with the same name as the hardcoded one)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using the default service account
skypilot-service-account
requires additional permissions because our code is self-correcting - it automatically fixes any service account misconfigurations by creating/patching resources (e.g., when user is upgrading versions or has accidentally deleted k8s RBAC resources created by SkyPilot)."create", "patch"
permissions on"clusterroles", "clusterrolebindings"
.skypilot-system
namespace if it doesn't exist. This requires additional"list", "create"
permissions onnamespaces
.These extra permissions on
"clusterroles", "clusterrolebindings", "namespaces"
may be considered too permissive in some environments (e.g., shared clusters). Perhaps we should keep the permissions here limited to minimal permissions required?