Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add compute unit limit to relayer transactions #865

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Add compute unit limit to relayer transactions #865

merged 11 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

aalu1418
Copy link
Collaborator

@aalu1418 aalu1418 commented Sep 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

Adding compute unit limit instructions to transactions

Resolves Dependencies

@aalu1418 aalu1418 requested review from a team as code owners September 26, 2024 23:09
jmank88
jmank88 previously approved these changes Sep 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
jadepark-dev
jadepark-dev previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
View reviewed changes
@jadepark-dev
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like there are minor conflicts to be resolved, but other than that, it looks good to me!

@aalu1418 aalu1418 dismissed stale reviews from jadepark-dev and jmank88 via c1b7657 September 27, 2024 13:55
@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
1 Fixed issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
80.8% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

@aalu1418 aalu1418 merged commit 7e527aa into develop Sep 27, 2024
34 checks passed
@aalu1418 aalu1418 deleted the compute-unit-limit branch September 27, 2024 14:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jmank88 jmank88 jmank88 approved these changes

@jadepark-dev jadepark-dev jadepark-dev approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@aalu1418 @jadepark-dev @jmank88