Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve check block old detection #10733

Merged

Conversation

infiloop2
Copy link
Contributor

saw on matic, some payloads were stuck in retry loop as they were getting missing trie node error

adding that string to error check. Don't fully like the approach of handling error strings which got us here, open to better solutions

We're not fully relying on just latest-checkBlock > checkBlockTooOldRange because the range can differ from chains, and the existing 128 range was too small for arbitrum, causing lots of payloads to error out early

@infiloop2 infiloop2 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 20, 2023 17:03
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

I see that you haven't updated any CHANGELOG files. Would it make sense to do so?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

FelixFan1992
FelixFan1992 previously approved these changes Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

FelixFan1992
FelixFan1992 previously approved these changes Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate failed

Failed condition 0.0% 0.0% Coverage on New Code (is less than 80%)
Failed condition 4.44% Technical Debt Ratio on New Code (is greater than 4%)

See analysis details on SonarQube

@infiloop2 infiloop2 merged commit 5129a99 into release/2.5.1-automation Sep 20, 2023
134 of 135 checks passed
@infiloop2 infiloop2 deleted the chore/improve-check-block-old-detection branch September 20, 2023 18:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants