-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: only consider specified packages when stopping because of downgrading #65
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CondaEnvProcessor
participant DowngradedChecker
User->>CondaEnvProcessor: Request to update environment
CondaEnvProcessor->>DowngradedChecker: Check for downgraded packages
DowngradedChecker-->>CondaEnvProcessor: Return downgraded packages
CondaEnvProcessor->>CondaEnvProcessor: Determine unconstrained packages
CondaEnvProcessor->>CondaEnvProcessor: Compute set intersection for downgraded packages
CondaEnvProcessor->>User: Return error if downgrades detected
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
snakedeploy/conda.py (1)
Line range hint
225-231
: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for clarity.The changes look good and improve the accuracy of detecting downgraded packages. The new implementation ensures that only unconstrained dependencies that would be downgraded are considered, which should reduce false positives.
Consider renaming the
downgraded
variable todowngraded_unconstrained_deps
for clarity, as it now represents the intersection of unconstrained dependencies and those that would be downgraded. This would make the variable's purpose more explicit:downgraded_unconstrained_deps = set(unconstrained_deps) & set(downgraded()) if downgraded_unconstrained_deps: msg = ( f"Env {conda_env_path} could not be updated because the following packages " f"would be downgraded: {', '.join(downgraded_unconstrained_deps)}. Please consider a manual update " "of the environment." )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- snakedeploy/conda.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
snakedeploy/conda.py (1)
Pattern
**/*.py
: Do not try to improve formatting.
Do not suggest type annotations for functions that are defined inside of functions or methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of theself
argument of methods.
Do not suggest type annotation of thecls
argument of classmethods.
Do not suggest return type annotation if a function or method does not contain areturn
statement.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
snakedeploy/conda.py (1)
Line range hint
1-431
: Overall assessment of changesThe changes in this file effectively address the PR objective of only considering specified packages when stopping because of downgrading. The modification to the
update_env
method improves the accuracy of detecting downgraded packages by considering only unconstrained dependencies. This should reduce false positives and provide clearer feedback to users when environment updates fail due to package downgrades.The implementation is consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. No other significant changes were made to the file, and the overall structure and logic of the
CondaEnvProcessor
class remain intact.
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* --- ### [0.10.1](https://www.github.com/snakemake/snakedeploy/compare/v0.10.0...v0.10.1) (2024-10-09) ### Bug Fixes * only consider specified packages when stopping because of downgrading ([#65](https://www.github.com/snakemake/snakedeploy/issues/65)) ([2aa3f82](https://www.github.com/snakemake/snakedeploy/commit/2aa3f82bb44b91dd6288f88226ffdac28d4fcf78)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores