-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
conops template #116
Merged
Merged
conops template #116
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bb0c2cf
added 'project contents' and tweaked formatting in readme
capsulecorplab 3e675ff
added draft for conops template
capsulecorplab 4a3ff18
rearranged use case diagram: added left->right dir
capsulecorplab 67d890a
added UseCaseDellSat77.puml
capsulecorplab 8c8882a
replace plantuml with image ref to plantuml server
capsulecorplab 7acc335
removed UseCaseDellSat77.puml
capsulecorplab b1bdcc4
added table of contents to conops template
capsulecorplab 32944a4
italicized section descriptions in conops template
capsulecorplab 792da38
added tabulated preamble to conops template
capsulecorplab 356c635
added 'docs/' to project contents in readme
capsulecorplab 472eabe
converted remote image format from svg to png
capsulecorplab 3319dda
added travis and Makefile for generating pdf
capsulecorplab bff0ddf
added gem install bundler to travis
capsulecorplab b0b7170
added gem install for asciidoctor-pdf in travis
capsulecorplab f7b901c
removed gem install for bundler
capsulecorplab 09a0f74
replace DellSat-77 with FireSat use case diagram
capsulecorplab File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ | ||
:toc: macro | ||
|
||
[cols="1,1,1,1,1,1"] | ||
|=== | ||
6+^s|Title | ||
6+^|<title> | ||
|
||
1+s|Document Type | ||
2+|Conops | ||
1+s|Originating Department | ||
2+|Systems | ||
|
||
s|Document ID | ||
|<document id> | ||
s|Status | ||
|<status> | ||
s|Created | ||
|<dd/mm/yyyy> | ||
|
||
s|Authored by | ||
|<author> | ||
s|Reviewed by | ||
|<reviewer> | ||
s|Approved by | ||
|<approver> | ||
|
||
|=== | ||
|
||
toc::[] | ||
|
||
<<< | ||
|
||
_The ConOps, at the organization level, addresses the leadership's intended way of operating the organization. It may refer to the use of one or more systems, as black boxes, to forward the organization's goals and objectives. The ConOps document describes the organization's assumptions or intent in regard to an overall operation or series of operations of the business with using the system to be developed, existing systems, and possible future systems. This document is frequently embodied in long-range strategic plans and annual operational plans. The ConOps document serves as a basis for the organization to direct the overall characteristics of the future business and systems, for the project to understand its background, and for the users of this International Standard to implement the stakeholder requirements elicitation. The ConOps document should include the following information items._ | ||
|
||
== Purpose | ||
|
||
_Describe the purpose of this document by describing the current status of the organization, the goal of the long-range strategic plan, and gaps between them._ | ||
|
||
== Scope | ||
|
||
_Describe the scope of this document by specifying the organization's business domains to which it applies._ | ||
|
||
== Strategic plan | ||
|
||
_Describe the long-range strategic plan for the organization's business and resultant systems. This includes description when the current business of the organization should be changed and what systems should be implemented and operated. The plan may contain options with priority._ | ||
|
||
== Effectiveness | ||
|
||
_Estimate the effectiveness expected by implementing the plan._ | ||
|
||
== Overall operation | ||
|
||
=== Context | ||
|
||
_Describe an overall view for the organization's business, which business function or organizational unit is covered by which existing systems, and which is to be covered by planned systems. For more detailed description, major data resources and flows may be mapped onto the view._ | ||
|
||
=== Systems | ||
|
||
_List and outline the existing systems and systems to be developed in the future._ | ||
|
||
=== Organizational Unit | ||
|
||
_List and relate with each other the organizational units that play roles in business operation, systems operation, and their management._ | ||
|
||
image::http://www.plantuml.com/plantuml/svg/bP8zpzCm4CTtVueRco6iZrHLLQLIoaQbC6Ovd4jYzNoEpXT41Nntaa8fBsgZP_BmVxdVsTvbGxKnicDg3Io1XgutQ8AIjv34vNEG0HKZ3EZFs55b5oQOPPIEoQ6tfB0-oEUWIIA98SD7oWO7wO8GwVhcUSVNydqIqyJyXtB22oTiuCD0YfRkGfKO5QeGHyQP1_Oznazpqlr6WDLROgxGofUNMgQJc8DH0LyVRlKK5yeILaUI6OLg8IPl6domIosjfbXBlb8DA4YS2_VlOhUEmnVourpnFlKHHMenHSajQU7-N_aQEQKW1a5QHKLgfb4qJLD00qFjo1ucZsGm_5HgwGdPUa1f81lQE46wPpZmPWkhYYQxJp5EiM8DcqqGpsD3swrRvbgiM01SpF-jmUPR-SkUBUbCT9CUEvMGImkHxcPmhtdf-QAVVCdlRaVIZ95_0000[DellSat 77 Use Case Diagram] | ||
|
||
_Use case diagram illustrating Concept of Operations for DellSat-77 Satellite_.footnote:[Delligatti, L. (2014). SysML distilled. 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley Professional, p.82.] | ||
|
||
== Governance | ||
|
||
=== Governance policies | ||
|
||
_Describe policies or principles which will govern any critical business and technological decisions in implementing the plan._ | ||
|
||
=== Organization | ||
|
||
_Describe the organization unit that is responsible for the governance, and describe policies on organizational structure and human resource in system development._ | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Test comment |
||
|
||
=== Investment plan | ||
|
||
_Describe plans on possible investment for the development of systems and depict how the policies should be managed._ | ||
|
||
=== Information asset management | ||
|
||
_Describe policies of how information assets are managed and define which organizational unit is responsible for the management._ | ||
|
||
=== Security | ||
|
||
_Describe policies on security._ | ||
|
||
=== Business continuity plan | ||
|
||
_Describe policies on business continuity plan._ | ||
|
||
=== Compliance | ||
|
||
_Describe policies on regal and regulatory compliance._ | ||
|
||
|
||
''' | ||
|
||
===== Attribution | ||
|
||
This document is adapted from the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011 _International Standard - Systems and software engineering -- Life cycle processes --Requirements engineering_, available at https://standards.ieee.org/standard/29148-2011.html. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. great link |
||
|
||
===== Copyright (C) 2018 | ||
|
||
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. | ||
|
||
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. | ||
|
||
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@capsulecorplab this Conops seems much more focused on the people running the operation than the engineering and mechanical operations of the payload itself. This is in contrast to John Paterson's ConOps which is much more focused on the latter.
Should we add another section that's more narrowly focused on the engineering/mechanical processes, or is that meant to be embedded in the bigger context that's outline here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I noticed that too. We can either deviate from the original ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011 spec and rewrite the template to be more engineering focused, or we can try to refactor John's ConOps doc to fit into the bigger context as you suggest. I don't have a strong preference toward either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
John had actually written the OpsCon, where as Sean has focused on Conops. They are slightly different. Check this source for a quick difference: https://plus.google.com/104099794938550497171/posts/D51e89gh4RR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Document type in this case is Mission Concept and ConOps is the document name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the rest of the document seems fine. However, we can start investigating to determine each points mentioned in the table of content