Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 'one required flag' group #1952

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 16, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
98 changes: 98 additions & 0 deletions completions_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2830,6 +2830,104 @@ func TestCompletionForGroupedFlags(t *testing.T) {
}
}

func TestCompletionForOneRequiredGroupFlags(t *testing.T) {
getCmd := func() *Command {
rootCmd := &Command{
Use: "root",
Run: emptyRun,
}
childCmd := &Command{
Use: "child",
ValidArgsFunction: func(cmd *Command, args []string, toComplete string) ([]string, ShellCompDirective) {
return []string{"subArg"}, ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp
},
Run: emptyRun,
}
rootCmd.AddCommand(childCmd)

rootCmd.PersistentFlags().Int("ingroup1", -1, "ingroup1")
rootCmd.PersistentFlags().String("ingroup2", "", "ingroup2")

childCmd.Flags().Bool("ingroup3", false, "ingroup3")
childCmd.Flags().Bool("nogroup", false, "nogroup")

// Add flags to a group
childCmd.MarkFlagsOneRequired("ingroup1", "ingroup2", "ingroup3")

return rootCmd
}

// Each test case uses a unique command from the function above.
testcases := []struct {
desc string
args []string
expectedOutput string
}{
{
desc: "flags in group suggested without - prefix",
args: []string{"child", ""},
expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{
"--ingroup1",
"--ingroup2",
"--ingroup3",
"subArg",
":4",
"Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"),
},
{
desc: "flags in group suggested with - prefix",
args: []string{"child", "-"},
expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{
"--ingroup1",
"--ingroup2",
"--ingroup3",
":4",
"Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"),
},
{
desc: "when any flag in group present, other flags in group not suggested without - prefix",
args: []string{"child", "--ingroup2", "value", ""},
expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{
"subArg",
":4",
"Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"),
},
{
desc: "when all flags in group present, flags not suggested without - prefix",
args: []string{"child", "--ingroup1", "8", "--ingroup2", "value2", "--ingroup3", ""},
expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{
"subArg",
":4",
"Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"),
},
{
desc: "group ignored if some flags not applicable",
args: []string{"--ingroup2", "value", ""},
expectedOutput: strings.Join([]string{
"child",
"completion",
"help",
":4",
"Completion ended with directive: ShellCompDirectiveNoFileComp", ""}, "\n"),
},
}

for _, tc := range testcases {
t.Run(tc.desc, func(t *testing.T) {
c := getCmd()
args := []string{ShellCompNoDescRequestCmd}
args = append(args, tc.args...)
output, err := executeCommand(c, args...)
switch {
case err == nil && output != tc.expectedOutput:
t.Errorf("expected: %q, got: %q", tc.expectedOutput, output)
case err != nil:
t.Errorf("Unexpected error %q", err)
}
})
}
}

func TestCompletionForMutuallyExclusiveFlags(t *testing.T) {
getCmd := func() *Command {
rootCmd := &Command{
Expand Down
68 changes: 67 additions & 1 deletion flag_groups.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ import (

const (
requiredAsGroup = "cobra_annotation_required_if_others_set"
oneRequired = "cobra_annotation_one_required"
mutuallyExclusive = "cobra_annotation_mutually_exclusive"
)

Expand All @@ -43,6 +44,22 @@ func (c *Command) MarkFlagsRequiredTogether(flagNames ...string) {
}
}

// MarkFlagsOneRequired marks the given flags with annotations so that Cobra errors
// if the command is invoked without at least one flag from the given set of flags.
func (c *Command) MarkFlagsOneRequired(flagNames ...string) {
c.mergePersistentFlags()
for _, v := range flagNames {
f := c.Flags().Lookup(v)
if f == nil {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("Failed to find flag %q and mark it as being in a one-required flag group", v))
}
if err := c.Flags().SetAnnotation(v, oneRequired, append(f.Annotations[oneRequired], strings.Join(flagNames, " "))); err != nil {
// Only errs if the flag isn't found.
panic(err)
}
}
}

// MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive marks the given flags with annotations so that Cobra errors
// if the command is invoked with more than one flag from the given set of flags.
func (c *Command) MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive(flagNames ...string) {
Expand All @@ -59,7 +76,7 @@ func (c *Command) MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive(flagNames ...string) {
}
}

// ValidateFlagGroups validates the mutuallyExclusive/requiredAsGroup logic and returns the
// ValidateFlagGroups validates the mutuallyExclusive/oneRequired/requiredAsGroup logic and returns the
// first error encountered.
func (c *Command) ValidateFlagGroups() error {
if c.DisableFlagParsing {
Expand All @@ -71,15 +88,20 @@ func (c *Command) ValidateFlagGroups() error {
// groupStatus format is the list of flags as a unique ID,
// then a map of each flag name and whether it is set or not.
groupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{}
oneRequiredGroupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{}
mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{}
flags.VisitAll(func(pflag *flag.Flag) {
processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, requiredAsGroup, groupStatus)
processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, oneRequired, oneRequiredGroupStatus)
processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, mutuallyExclusive, mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus)
})

if err := validateRequiredFlagGroups(groupStatus); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := validateOneRequiredFlagGroups(oneRequiredGroupStatus); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := validateExclusiveFlagGroups(mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus); err != nil {
return err
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -142,6 +164,27 @@ func validateRequiredFlagGroups(data map[string]map[string]bool) error {
return nil
}

func validateOneRequiredFlagGroups(data map[string]map[string]bool) error {
keys := sortedKeys(data)
for _, flagList := range keys {
flagnameAndStatus := data[flagList]
var set []string
for flagname, isSet := range flagnameAndStatus {
if isSet {
set = append(set, flagname)
}
}
if len(set) >= 1 {
continue
}

// Sort values, so they can be tested/scripted against consistently.
sort.Strings(set)
return fmt.Errorf("at least one of the flags in the group [%v] is required", flagList)
}
return nil
}

func validateExclusiveFlagGroups(data map[string]map[string]bool) error {
keys := sortedKeys(data)
for _, flagList := range keys {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -176,6 +219,7 @@ func sortedKeys(m map[string]map[string]bool) []string {

// enforceFlagGroupsForCompletion will do the following:
// - when a flag in a group is present, other flags in the group will be marked required
// - when none of the flags in a one-required group are present, all flags in the group will be marked required
// - when a flag in a mutually exclusive group is present, other flags in the group will be marked as hidden
// This allows the standard completion logic to behave appropriately for flag groups
func (c *Command) enforceFlagGroupsForCompletion() {
Expand All @@ -185,9 +229,11 @@ func (c *Command) enforceFlagGroupsForCompletion() {

flags := c.Flags()
groupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{}
oneRequiredGroupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{}
mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus := map[string]map[string]bool{}
c.Flags().VisitAll(func(pflag *flag.Flag) {
processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, requiredAsGroup, groupStatus)
processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, oneRequired, oneRequiredGroupStatus)
processFlagForGroupAnnotation(flags, pflag, mutuallyExclusive, mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus)
})

Expand All @@ -204,6 +250,26 @@ func (c *Command) enforceFlagGroupsForCompletion() {
}
}

// If none of the flags of a one-required group are present, we make all the flags
// of that group required so that the shell completion suggests them automatically
for flagList, flagnameAndStatus := range oneRequiredGroupStatus {
set := 0

for _, isSet := range flagnameAndStatus {
if isSet {
set++
}
}

// None of the flags of the group are set, mark all flags in the group
// as required
if set == 0 {
for _, fName := range strings.Split(flagList, " ") {
_ = c.MarkFlagRequired(fName)
}
}
}

// If a flag that is mutually exclusive to others is present, we hide the other
// flags of that group so the shell completion does not suggest them
for flagList, flagnameAndStatus := range mutuallyExclusiveGroupStatus {
Expand Down
63 changes: 53 additions & 10 deletions flag_groups_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -43,13 +43,15 @@ func TestValidateFlagGroups(t *testing.T) {

// Each test case uses a unique command from the function above.
testcases := []struct {
desc string
flagGroupsRequired []string
flagGroupsExclusive []string
subCmdFlagGroupsRequired []string
subCmdFlagGroupsExclusive []string
args []string
expectErr string
desc string
flagGroupsRequired []string
flagGroupsOneRequired []string
flagGroupsExclusive []string
subCmdFlagGroupsRequired []string
subCmdFlagGroupsOneRequired []string
subCmdFlagGroupsExclusive []string
args []string
expectErr string
}{
{
desc: "No flags no problem",
Expand All @@ -62,6 +64,11 @@ func TestValidateFlagGroups(t *testing.T) {
flagGroupsRequired: []string{"a b c"},
args: []string{"--a=foo"},
expectErr: "if any flags in the group [a b c] are set they must all be set; missing [b c]",
}, {
desc: "One-required flag group not satisfied",
flagGroupsOneRequired: []string{"a b"},
args: []string{"--c=foo"},
expectErr: "at least one of the flags in the group [a b] is required",
}, {
desc: "Exclusive flag group not satisfied",
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"a b c"},
Expand All @@ -72,6 +79,11 @@ func TestValidateFlagGroups(t *testing.T) {
flagGroupsRequired: []string{"a b c", "a d"},
args: []string{"--c=foo", "--d=foo"},
expectErr: `if any flags in the group [a b c] are set they must all be set; missing [a b]`,
}, {
desc: "Multiple one-required flag group not satisfied returns first error",
flagGroupsOneRequired: []string{"a b", "d e"},
args: []string{"--c=foo", "--f=foo"},
expectErr: `at least one of the flags in the group [a b] is required`,
}, {
desc: "Multiple exclusive flag group not satisfied returns first error",
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"a b c", "a d"},
Expand All @@ -82,32 +94,57 @@ func TestValidateFlagGroups(t *testing.T) {
flagGroupsRequired: []string{"a d", "a b", "a c"},
args: []string{"--a=foo"},
expectErr: `if any flags in the group [a b] are set they must all be set; missing [b]`,
}, {
desc: "Validation of one-required groups occurs on groups in sorted order",
flagGroupsOneRequired: []string{"d e", "a b", "f g"},
args: []string{"--c=foo"},
expectErr: `at least one of the flags in the group [a b] is required`,
}, {
desc: "Validation of exclusive groups occurs on groups in sorted order",
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"a d", "a b", "a c"},
args: []string{"--a=foo", "--b=foo", "--c=foo"},
expectErr: `if any flags in the group [a b] are set none of the others can be; [a b] were all set`,
}, {
desc: "Persistent flags utilize both features and can fail required groups",
desc: "Persistent flags utilize required and exclusive groups and can fail required groups",
flagGroupsRequired: []string{"a e", "e f"},
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"f g"},
args: []string{"--a=foo", "--f=foo", "--g=foo"},
expectErr: `if any flags in the group [a e] are set they must all be set; missing [e]`,
}, {
desc: "Persistent flags utilize both features and can fail mutually exclusive groups",
desc: "Persistent flags utilize one-required and exclusive groups and can fail one-required groups",
flagGroupsOneRequired: []string{"a b", "e f"},
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"e f"},
args: []string{"--e=foo"},
expectErr: `at least one of the flags in the group [a b] is required`,
}, {
desc: "Persistent flags utilize required and exclusive groups and can fail mutually exclusive groups",
flagGroupsRequired: []string{"a e", "e f"},
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"f g"},
args: []string{"--a=foo", "--e=foo", "--f=foo", "--g=foo"},
expectErr: `if any flags in the group [f g] are set none of the others can be; [f g] were all set`,
}, {
desc: "Persistent flags utilize both features and can pass",
desc: "Persistent flags utilize required and exclusive groups and can pass",
flagGroupsRequired: []string{"a e", "e f"},
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"f g"},
args: []string{"--a=foo", "--e=foo", "--f=foo"},
}, {
desc: "Persistent flags utilize one-required and exclusive groups and can pass",
flagGroupsOneRequired: []string{"a e", "e f"},
flagGroupsExclusive: []string{"f g"},
args: []string{"--a=foo", "--e=foo", "--f=foo"},
}, {
desc: "Subcmds can use required groups using inherited flags",
subCmdFlagGroupsRequired: []string{"e subonly"},
args: []string{"subcmd", "--e=foo", "--subonly=foo"},
}, {
desc: "Subcmds can use one-required groups using inherited flags",
subCmdFlagGroupsOneRequired: []string{"e subonly"},
args: []string{"subcmd", "--e=foo", "--subonly=foo"},
}, {
desc: "Subcmds can use one-required groups using inherited flags and fail one-required groups",
subCmdFlagGroupsOneRequired: []string{"e subonly"},
args: []string{"subcmd"},
expectErr: "at least one of the flags in the group [e subonly] is required",
}, {
desc: "Subcmds can use exclusive groups using inherited flags",
subCmdFlagGroupsExclusive: []string{"e subonly"},
Expand All @@ -130,12 +167,18 @@ func TestValidateFlagGroups(t *testing.T) {
for _, flagGroup := range tc.flagGroupsRequired {
c.MarkFlagsRequiredTogether(strings.Split(flagGroup, " ")...)
}
for _, flagGroup := range tc.flagGroupsOneRequired {
c.MarkFlagsOneRequired(strings.Split(flagGroup, " ")...)
}
for _, flagGroup := range tc.flagGroupsExclusive {
c.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive(strings.Split(flagGroup, " ")...)
}
for _, flagGroup := range tc.subCmdFlagGroupsRequired {
sub.MarkFlagsRequiredTogether(strings.Split(flagGroup, " ")...)
}
for _, flagGroup := range tc.subCmdFlagGroupsOneRequired {
sub.MarkFlagsOneRequired(strings.Split(flagGroup, " ")...)
}
for _, flagGroup := range tc.subCmdFlagGroupsExclusive {
sub.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive(strings.Split(flagGroup, " ")...)
}
Expand Down
11 changes: 10 additions & 1 deletion site/content/user_guide.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -349,7 +349,16 @@ rootCmd.Flags().BoolVar(&ofYaml, "yaml", false, "Output in YAML")
rootCmd.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("json", "yaml")
```

In both of these cases:
If you want to require least one flag from a group to be present, you can use `MarkFlagsOneRequired`.
marevers marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
This can be combined with `MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive` to enforce exactly one flag from a given group:
```go
rootCmd.Flags().BoolVar(&ofJson, "json", false, "Output in JSON")
rootCmd.Flags().BoolVar(&ofYaml, "yaml", false, "Output in YAML")
rootCmd.MarkFlagsOneRequired("json", "yaml")
rootCmd.MarkFlagsMutuallyExclusive("json", "yaml")
```

In these cases:
- both local and persistent flags can be used
- **NOTE:** the group is only enforced on commands where every flag is defined
- a flag may appear in multiple groups
Expand Down