Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer to customize PropertyResolver #30304

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

terminux
Copy link
Contributor

@terminux terminux commented Apr 7, 2023

Overview

Currently, PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer only uses PropertySourcesPropertyResolver by default, and cannot customize the resolver.

For example, at the Spring Boot level, it may be necessary to replace PropertySourcesPropertyResolver with ConfigurationPropertySourcesPropertyResolver to support short-circuiting.

Related Issues

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on label Apr 7, 2023
@sbrannen sbrannen added in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Apr 7, 2023
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Sep 8, 2023

Thanks for the PR @terminux. We've fixed this in the meantime, see #26761

@snicoll snicoll closed this Sep 8, 2023
@snicoll snicoll added status: duplicate A duplicate of another issue and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Sep 8, 2023
@sbrannen sbrannen changed the title Allow PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer to customize property resolver Allow PropertySourcesPlaceholderConfigurer to customize PropertyResolver Sep 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) status: duplicate A duplicate of another issue type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants