Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: resolves #4 #5

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

feat: resolves #4 #5

merged 13 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

sim13pods
Copy link
Contributor

As per commit message, this modification introduces the product:acquisition_type property

@sim13pods
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi there @m-mohr
I would like to kindly ask you to review my first PR, many thanks in advance!

@fabricebrito
Copy link

Hi @m-mohr, looking forward for your feedback on this one :-)

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@emmanuelmathot emmanuelmathot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the new field is missing in the field table.

@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ The fields in the table below can be used in these parts of STAC documents:
 | product:type                | string | The product type.                                            |
 | product:timeliness          | string | The average expected timeliness of the product as an [ISO 8601 Duration](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Durations). |
 | product:timeliness_category | string | A proprietary category identifier for the timeliness of the product. |
+| product:acquisition_type    | string | The acquisition type of the product.                         |
 
 > \[!IMPORTANT]  
 > `product:timeliness` is REQUIRED if `product:timeliness_category` is provided.

@fabricebrito
Copy link

@emmanuelmathot looking forward for your review

@sim13pods
Copy link
Contributor Author

@m-mohr I addressed also all the MD warnings, build should be clean right now

@sim13pods
Copy link
Contributor Author

@m-mohr addressed also Validation error in core, skipping extension validation error

Copy link

@fabricebrito fabricebrito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sim13pods
Copy link
Contributor Author

@m-mohr at the state of the art, we got approvals from both @emmanuelmathot and @fabricebrito , PR can be now merged, many thanks in advance!

@emmanuelmathot emmanuelmathot merged commit e0240c4 into stac-extensions:main Jul 17, 2024
1 check passed
@sim13pods
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @emmanuelmathot for merging, very appreciated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants