Skip to content

fix get items recursive documentation #800

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mishaschwartz
Copy link

@mishaschwartz mishaschwartz commented May 28, 2025

Related Issue(s):

Description:

Clarifies get_items recursive behaviour as discussed in #799 (comment)

PR Checklist:

  • Code is formatted
  • Tests pass
  • Changes are added to CHANGELOG.md

@gadomski gadomski self-requested a review May 28, 2025 14:04
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 28, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.14%. Comparing base (21435b0) to head (b393214).
Report is 123 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pystac_client/client.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #800      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.43%   94.14%   +0.71%     
==========================================
  Files          13       15       +2     
  Lines         990     1213     +223     
==========================================
+ Hits          925     1142     +217     
- Misses         65       71       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mishaschwartz mishaschwartz requested a review from gadomski May 30, 2025 16:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants