Support abritrary epochs in TestChainstate

[jacinta-stacks]

Replaces #6608

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.66743% with 168 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 68.99%. Comparing base (060b56e) to head (3650058).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
stackslib/src/chainstate/tests/mod.rs	67.80%	141 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/tests/consensus.rs	95.96%	14 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/coordinator/mod.rs	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/nakamoto/tests/node.rs	89.09%	6 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (68.99%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6619      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    61.40%   68.99%   +7.59%     
===========================================
  Files          574      574              
  Lines       354916   355501     +585     
===========================================
+ Hits        217939   245284   +27345     
+ Misses      136977   110217   -26760     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
stacks-common/src/types/mod.rs	80.66% <ø> (+0.58%)	⬆️
...ackslib/src/chainstate/nakamoto/coordinator/mod.rs	81.76% <100.00%> (-0.62%)	⬇️
stackslib/src/net/tests/mod.rs	53.47% <100.00%> (-0.08%)	⬇️
stackslib/src/chainstate/nakamoto/tests/node.rs	83.95% <89.09%> (+0.39%)	⬆️
stackslib/src/chainstate/coordinator/mod.rs	80.00% <0.00%> (+1.15%)	⬆️
stackslib/src/chainstate/tests/consensus.rs	94.11% <95.96%> (+1.84%)	⬆️
stackslib/src/chainstate/tests/mod.rs	68.31% <67.80%> (-1.77%)	⬇️

... and 328 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 060b56e...3650058. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[francesco-stacks]

I still need to finish the review of the changes in the consensus.rs file, but GREAT work!

[jacinta-stacks]

Great work! I think we're very close here. The structure is already much clearer after the recent changes.

I agree with Federico's observations.That said, I'm fine either addressing these refinements (and my comment!) in this PR or deferring them to a follow-up one, now that the core logic is in a solid shape.

Federico's suggestion ended up being a pretty minimal change after the cleanup round so I did as part of this PR. see 6069c36 :)

[federico-stacks]

LGTM!

just added a bunch of nits for doc format consistency along the code.

[francesco-stacks]

lgtm

[jacinta-stacks]

Looking into all the failing tests which don't seem to like the assertions I have enforced. EDIT: not understanding why the integration tests aren't running correctly... @wileyj would you happen to know why they don't seem to want to run and just immediately fail?

[wileyj]

would have to check, but I would guess it's the tests json is not being creates successfullly. i see that step is passing, but if the json is empty it would present like this. will take a closer look tomorrow

…

On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 20:11 jacinta-stacks ***@***.***> wrote: *jacinta-stacks* left a comment (stacks-network/stacks-core#6619) <#6619 (comment)> Looking into all the failing tests which don't seem to like the assertions I have enforced. EDIT: not understanding why the integration tests aren't running correctly... @wileyj <https://github.com/wileyj> would you happen to know why they don't seem to want to run and just immediately fail? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6619 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAVXIHF2XGZ47H5FXPFRGH333F2IHAVCNFSM6AAAAACJ6CF3VCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTIOBYGY2TGNJYGE> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>