-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reload k with epoch #4396
base: dag-master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Reload k with epoch #4396
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update ghost DAG management by integrating a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant BC as BlockChain
participant DAG as DAG Instance
participant GDM as GhostdagManager
participant KS as KStore
BC->>DAG: execute_dag_block()
DAG->>GDM: update_k(new_k)
GDM->>KS: update_k(new_k)
KS-->>GDM: k updated
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
chain/src/chain.rs
(1 hunks)flexidag/src/blockdag.rs
(2 hunks)flexidag/src/ghostdag/protocol.rs
(11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
flexidag/src/ghostdag/protocol.rs (3)
13-33
: LGTM! Thread-safe implementation ofKStore
.The implementation provides safe concurrent access to the
k
value usingArc<RwLock<KType>>
with a clean API.
42-42
: LGTM! Consistent changes toGhostdagManager
.The changes to use
Arc<KStore>
maintain thread safety and are consistently applied to both the field and constructor.Also applies to: 57-57
149-150
: LGTM! Consistent updates tok
value usage.All usages of
k
have been correctly updated to usek_store.get_k()
, and a newupdate_k
method has been added to support dynamic updates to thek
value.Also applies to: 207-209, 348-349, 371-372, 376-377, 426-428, 514-519
flexidag/src/blockdag.rs (1)
17-17
: LGTM! Proper integration ofKStore
inBlockDAG
.The changes correctly initialize and integrate the new
KStore
struct, maintaining thread safety withArc
.Also applies to: 73-74
self.dag() | ||
.ghost_dag_manager() | ||
.update_k(epoch.max_uncles_per_block().try_into().unwrap()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling for the type conversion.
The try_into().unwrap()
could panic if the epoch's max uncles value cannot be converted to KType
. Consider using proper error handling.
Apply this diff to handle the conversion safely:
- .update_k(epoch.max_uncles_per_block().try_into().unwrap());
+ .update_k(epoch.max_uncles_per_block().try_into().map_err(|e| {
+ format_err!("Failed to convert max_uncles_per_block to KType: {}", e)
+ })?);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
self.dag() | |
.ghost_dag_manager() | |
.update_k(epoch.max_uncles_per_block().try_into().unwrap()); | |
self.dag() | |
.ghost_dag_manager() | |
.update_k(epoch.max_uncles_per_block().try_into().map_err(|e| { | |
format_err!("Failed to convert max_uncles_per_block to KType: {}", e) | |
})?); |
Benchmark for d09ee1eClick to view benchmark
|
Benchmark for 6030bf6Click to view benchmark
|
Pull request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor