Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(block_hash): tx data test #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

yoavGrs
Copy link
Collaborator

@yoavGrs yoavGrs commented Jun 10, 2024

Replace block info test with tx data test.


This change is Reviewable

@yoavGrs yoavGrs self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.77%. Comparing base (f6cfecb) to head (7907cd2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #216      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.74%   63.77%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          36       35       -1     
  Lines        1663     1662       -1     
  Branches     1663     1662       -1     
==========================================
  Hits         1060     1060              
+ Misses        552      551       -1     
  Partials       51       51              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 2 of 4 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 2 of 4 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @yoavGrs)

a discussion (no related file):
why was block info removed in this pr?


@yoavGrs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yoavGrs commented Jun 10, 2024

Previously, dorimedini-starkware wrote…

why was block info removed in this pr?

I'm removing it in the python as well.
The relevant fields are already in the transaction output.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 2 of 4 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @yoavGrs)

a discussion (no related file):

Previously, yoavGrs wrote…

I'm removing it in the python as well.
The relevant fields are already in the transaction output.

please split this PR
block info deletion is unrelated to the test addition


@yoavGrs yoavGrs force-pushed the yoav/block_hash/tx_data_object branch from 7907cd2 to c5c79d4 Compare June 10, 2024 12:34
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@yoavGrs yoavGrs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: 0 of 4 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @dorimedini-starkware)

a discussion (no related file):

Previously, dorimedini-starkware wrote…

please split this PR
block info deletion is unrelated to the test addition

Done.


Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 1 of 4 files at r1, 3 of 3 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @yoavGrs)

@yoavGrs yoavGrs added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit f69e26f Jun 13, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants