Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: splitting serializable trait #65

Merged

Conversation

AvivYossef-starkware
Copy link
Collaborator

@AvivYossef-starkware AvivYossef-starkware commented Apr 24, 2024

The proposal is to divide the serializable trait into two separate traits, namely serializable and deserializable. This will allow for a clearer separation of concerns between the serialization and deserialization processes.


This change is Reviewable

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.13%. Comparing base (758a47a) to head (9a57bbd).

Files Patch % Lines
crates/committer/src/storage/errors.rs 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #65   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.13%   73.13%           
=======================================
  Files          19       18    -1     
  Lines         644      644           
  Branches      644      644           
=======================================
  Hits          471      471           
  Misses        143      143           
  Partials       30       30           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 11 of 11 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @nimrod-starkware)

Copy link
Contributor

@nimrod-starkware nimrod-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)

Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)

@AvivYossef-starkware AvivYossef-starkware force-pushed the aviv/impl_serializable_for_filled_node branch 3 times, most recently from d780fa6 to 50ed640 Compare April 24, 2024 09:11
@AvivYossef-starkware AvivYossef-starkware changed the base branch from aviv/impl_serializable_for_filled_node to main April 24, 2024 10:55
@AvivYossef-starkware AvivYossef-starkware force-pushed the aviv/refactor_splitting_serializable_trait branch from e7df861 to d6fb97b Compare April 24, 2024 11:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@dorimedini-starkware dorimedini-starkware left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 6 of 6 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @AvivYossef-starkware)

@AvivYossef-starkware AvivYossef-starkware force-pushed the aviv/refactor_splitting_serializable_trait branch from d6fb97b to 67b337b Compare April 24, 2024 11:57
@AvivYossef-starkware AvivYossef-starkware force-pushed the aviv/refactor_splitting_serializable_trait branch from 67b337b to 9a57bbd Compare April 24, 2024 11:58
@AvivYossef-starkware AvivYossef-starkware added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 6027207 Apr 24, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants