Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow users to input data with a TreeSummarizedExperiment object #82

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

gthopkins
Copy link
Collaborator

This responds to issue #64, wherein we decided to allow users to input TreeSummarizedExperiment objects, in response to continued errors from the phyloseq package. This currently implements the core functionality, without consideration to using radEmu after aggregating TreeSummarizedExperiment objects.

This responds to issue statdivlab#64, wherein we decided to allow users to input `TreeSummarizedExperiment` objects, in response to continued errors from the `phyloseq` package. This currently implements the core functionality, without consideration to using `radEmu` after aggregating `TreeSummarizedExperiment` objects.
@svteichman
Copy link
Collaborator

great job with the test file here to test your new functionality!! I like to also test that my desired errors come up when they should, so I might add one more quick test that when you forget the assay argument you get your desired error.

@gthopkins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you for this suggestion, @svteichman! I will be sure to add this error check and figure out why I am getting a warning message.

@gthopkins
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@svteichman I implemented that error check and this code now passes checks. Whenever you have a moment to review, this should be good to merge!

@svteichman
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks great to me - I'll merge this, and you can close the related issue!

@svteichman svteichman merged commit d90adb0 into statdivlab:main Sep 19, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants